My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00380
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:43 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:42:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.100
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects-Project Studies - NRCS-Ft Lyon Canal Co-Limestone-Graveyard Creeks
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/1/1992
Author
US Dept of Agricultu
Title
Lower Arkansas River Basin - Water Quality Study - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002567 <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />FT. LYON - This run included all of the Fort Lyon Canal. <br />The efficiency factor used was 26.5 percent. <br /> <br />LIMESTONE - This run simulated the Limestone-Graveyard <br />Creek portion of the Fort Lyon Canal system. The <br />efficiency factor used was 12.9 percent. <br /> <br />KEESE - This run included the Keese Canal only. The <br />efficiency factor used was 34.4 percent. <br /> <br />CLAY CREEK - This run included the Fort Bent, Lamar, <br />Manvel, and the XY and Graham Canals. The following <br />efficiency factors were used: <br /> <br />Fort Bent <br />Lamar <br />Manvel <br />XY and Graham <br /> <br />33.3 percent <br />0.6 percent <br />17.2 percent <br />31.2 percent <br /> <br />HORSE CREEK - This run included the Amity and Buffalo <br />Canals. The efficiency factors were: Amity - 32.9 <br />percentj and Buffalo - 39.8 percent. <br /> <br />ALL SYSTEMS - This run include all of the canals <br />described above. The same efficiency factors were used <br />as shown in the individual runs. <br /> <br />The results of each of these runs are shown in Table 9 and <br />Figures 10 through 12. No significant differences in either <br />flows or salt loading were found in any alternative runs <br />made. <br /> <br />The data from the river model indicated that: <br /> <br />(1) changes in irrigation management will have little <br />effect on the riverj or <br /> <br />(2) The model does not reflect the total effects of <br />irrigation projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.