Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"1n <br />from implementation of Alternative #3 If other <br />subalternalives were accepted. If groundwater <br />recharge were recognized as a valid nparian <br />claim (3c), and if claims for such purposes were <br />eventually integrated into the appropnalive <br />rightssyslem. a few muniCipalities might realize a <br />greater level of protection for mUnlcipal well <br />fIelds. <br /> <br />STUDY #7 <br />SUPPLEMENTAL WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />Implementation of Alternative #3 or #4 of this <br />repOrt could decrease the amount 01 surface <br />water available lor storage or delivery to areas <br />with Inadequate supplies. This effect would <br />OCcur through the recognItion and administra- <br />tion of additional claims to the surface water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />STUDY #8 <br />INTERBASIN TRANSFERS <br /> <br />STUDY #9 <br />WEATHER MODIFICATION <br /> <br />These two studies are no longer scheduled for <br />completion as a part of the Stale Waler Planning <br />and Review Process. Therefore. no attempt has <br />been made to Identify possible relationships with <br />Ihis study. <br /> <br />STUDY #10 <br />WATER. ENERGY <br /> <br />STUDY #11 <br />SURFACE. GROUNDWATER <br />INTEGRATION <br /> <br />These two studies are identified and discussed <br />In the September 15, 1982 Annual Report and <br />Plan of Work. The Scope of these studies, how. <br />ever, has not been well defmed at the time this <br />report is being prepared and no attempt has <br />been made 10 identify Possible relationships wllh <br />this study. <br /> <br />5.3 <br />