My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00353
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00353
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:34 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:40:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.43.H.2
Description
Grand Valley/Orchard Mesa -
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/11/1993
Title
Analysis of the Orchard Mesa Check Operation Under Current and Historic Stream Administration Practices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Presently, streamflows must average approximately 1,950 cfs to meet the same demand. The increased <br />demand of the Cameo call is graphically shown in Figure 4. The figure compares the actual recorded <br />streamflow at Cameo during dry years for both administrative periods. It is clear that under current <br />administration, late summer streamflows at Cameo are maintained at a greater volume than they were <br />historically. Most, if not all, of this increased water is made available to the Cameo call through release of <br />water from Green Mountain Reservoir. We believe that this represents a new demand on the river that was <br />not contemplated by the Bureau of Reclamation during development of the December 22, 1983 Green <br />Mountain Reservoir operating policy. <br /> <br />! <br />Ji <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />POTENTIAL IMPACT - WEST SLOPE WATER USERS <br /> <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />" <br />1 <br />, <br />1 <br /> <br />The 66,000 AF of Green Mountain Reservoir storage identified to meet the demands of west slope <br /> <br /> <br />beneficiaries was established by the Bureau based upon actual releases made in 1977. 1977 was <br /> <br /> <br />an extreme drought year in Colorado and severe shortages in the Colorado River placed high <br /> <br /> <br />demand on Green Mountain Reservoir. Hydrologic studies of various basins in western Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />indicate that a drought as severe as 1977 occurs on a frequency of only 1 year in 70. Due to the <br /> <br /> <br />severity of the drought, the Bureau, in developing it's operating policy, believed that the 66,000 <br /> <br /> <br />AF represented the maximum amount of storage that would have to be set aside for west slope <br /> <br /> <br />beneficiaries. The remaining yield of the 100,000 AF power pool was made available for sale to <br /> <br /> <br />private and public entities under long-term contracts. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />.~ <br />i <br /> <br />II <br />1 <br />. <br /> <br />The releases made from Green Mountain Reservoir in 1977 occurred during the period of historic <br />administration of the Check. During this year, the wrinen call and subsequent release of water <br />from Green Mountain were made only after the Check structure was fully implemented. This <br />condition was confirmed in a lener to the Bureau from then Division Eng'ineer Enewold (Anachment <br /> <br />2). <br /> <br />..1 <br />! <br /> <br />The water demand analysis outlined in the previous chapter suggests that if the Check had been <br /> <br /> <br />administered as it is currently, substantially more water than 66,000 AF would have been released <br /> <br /> <br />from Green Mountain Reservoir to protect west slope beneficiaries, Because the Bureau's <br /> <br /> <br />operating policy limits releases to no more than 66,000 AF for this purpose, it is probable that the <br /> <br /> <br />reservoir pool would be exhausted at some point during the summer and west slope users would <br /> <br /> <br />be vulnerable to a call during the late irrigation season. This concern was substantiated in part <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />I <br />;l <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br />j <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.