My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00346
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00346
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:32 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.17
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1986
Author
USDOI - BOR
Title
Lake Powell Evaporation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TERRACE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION <br /> <br />The third part is the evapotranspiration from the terrace areas under pre- <br />reservoir conditions. It was computed by multiplying the evapotranspira- <br />tion rate by the terrace area. The evapotranspiration rate was determined <br />by the Blaney-Criddle method 7/ described below. The areas were deter- <br />mined by the same survey referred to above. This water reaches the root <br />zone mostly by capillary action with some by precipitation. The terrace <br />area-elevation curve is shown in Figure 6. The resulting evapotranspira- <br />tion is shown in Table a Column 4. <br /> <br />BLANEY-CRIDDLE METHOD <br /> <br />The Blaney-Criddle method of computing evapotranspiration (consumptive-use) <br />was chosen because of the minimal data requirements and accuracy acceptable <br />for this purpose. The basic equation is: <br />u=fk <br />Where u is the evapotranspiration rate in inches. k is an emperical coef- <br />fecient dependent on the type of vegetation. Consumptive use coefficients <br />have been determined mostly for irrigated crops so there has been little <br />investigation of native vegetation. <br /> <br />From values given for k by Blaney 10/ for native vegetation for several <br />densities of vegetation 1.1 was selected for the streamside area and 0.9 <br />was used for the terrace area. The variable f is calculated as (t)(p)/100. <br />Where t is the mean monthly air temperature in degrees farenheit and p is <br />the monthly percent of annual daylight hours and is dependent upon the <br />latitude. 390 north latitude was used. Therefore u=(t)x(p)x(k)/100. <br />Table 6 shows the computation of (p)x(k)/100 for the streamside area and <br />the terrace area. This was multiplied by the average temperature for the <br />month to obtain the evapotranspiration rates. <br /> <br />EVAPOTRANSPIRATION OF REMAINING AREAS <br /> <br />The fourth part is the evapotranspiration from the remaining area of the <br />reservoir under pre-reservoir condition. <br /> <br />Most of the precipitation falling on the area of Lake Powell would not have <br />produced runoff because it would have evaporated from the vegetation and <br />soil or it would have transpired from the vegetation. In consumptive use <br />studies this is termed effective precipitation. It does not include preci- <br />pitation that causes runoff. The method of determining the effective pre- <br />cipitation used is described in a report by R. A. Schleusener ~/. The <br />precipitation was computed from seven stations: Page, Wahweap, Bullfrog, <br />Canyonlands, Hite, Mexican Hut, and Natural bridges. Since each of these <br />stations were located above the maximum elevation of Lake Powell, and since <br />precipitation increases with elevation, it was necessary to reduce the pre- <br />cipitation to an equivalent for Lake Powell at a representative elevation <br />of 3,600 feet. This was done by plotting the average annual precipitation <br />for 1963 through 1980 against the elevation for the seven stations and <br />drawing a curve throught the points. The resulting average annual precipi- <br />tation from this curve is 6.33 inches. The ratio of 6.33 to the average <br />annual precipitation at each station was multiplied by the monthly precipi- <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.