My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00346
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00346
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:32 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.17
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1986
Author
USDOI - BOR
Title
Lake Powell Evaporation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />reservoir did not exist. For this study the evapotranspiration that must <br />be subtracted was determined in four parts. <br /> <br />EVAPORATION FROM THE <br />PRE-RESERVOIR WATER SURFACE <br /> <br />The first part was the evaporation from the pre-reservoir river water sur- <br />face. It is computed by multiplying the area of the river by the gross <br />evaporation rate. The river water surface area was determined using the <br />following criteria. <br /> <br />(1) The aerial photographs from which the Lake Powell topography came <br />were flown in September and October of 1958 and 1959 when the river was at <br />a very low stage. <br />(2) The average flow of the river over the period of record was about <br />18,000 c.f.s. at Lees Ferry. <br />(3) Tail water curves taken in the vicinity of Glen Canyon Dam indicate <br />a rise of only about 5 feet for an increase in flow of 15,000 c.f.s. <br />(4) Since the water line shown on the topography represents a flow of <br />about 6,000 c.f.s., it was assumed that the contour closest to this water <br />line would represent average flow conditions. <br />(5) Where a contour crossed the river on a given topography sheet, a <br />line representing tne average f'cw 'ine was drawn in and the area planime- <br />tered accordingly. <br />(6) Sandbars that did not show vegetation were assumed to be included in <br />the water surface area at 18,000 c.f.s. average flow. <br /> <br />The river-elevation relationship <br />tion rate from Table 4 was used. <br />in Table 8 Column 2. <br /> <br />is shown in Figure 4. The gross evapora- <br />The resulting river evaporation is shown <br /> <br />STREAMSIDE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION <br /> <br />The second part was the evapotranspiration that would have occurred from <br />the vegetation, which is mostly phreatophyte, and evaporation from the <br />wetted soil on the streambank if the reservoir did not exist. It was com- <br />puted by multiplying the evapotranspiration rate by tne streamside area. <br />The evapotranspiration rate was computed by the Blaney - Criddle method 7/ <br />as shown in Table 7 and described below. The streamside areas were deter~ <br />mined under a contract between the University of Utah and the Bureau of <br />Reclamation in the late 1950's before Lake Powell started to fill 9/. The <br />vegetation density was measured along transects. These were used as an <br />index to make ocular estimates of the remaining areas. The areas were <br />measured by planimeter from maps which were prepared from overlay maps and <br />tabular data from the field. The area-elevation relationship is shown in <br />Figure 5. The main source of water for this part is from percolation with <br />a small contribution from precipitation. The streamside evapotranspiration <br />is shown in Table 8 Column 3. <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.