Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.7 <br /> <br />re~ti~al values on the Fryingpan River (paragraph 10, OP) is made through <br />a provision of minimum flows below the junction of the Fryingpan River and Rocky <br />Fork Creek. Also, the lands and surface waters of Ruedi Reservoir are open for <br />public recreation (paragraph 12, OP). <br />In order to conduct a second round of water sales, Reclamation has prepared <br />thi s Fi nal Suppl ement to the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project's Envi ronmental Statement <br />which was submitted to the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) in 1975. A <br />Draft Supplement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency, October 6, <br />1983. Thi s FSES addresses the environmental consequences associ ated with <br />alternative operations of Ruedi Reservoir to meet competing water demands which <br />include industrial, municipal development, recre~tion, wildlife, fisheries, and <br />hydropower. This FSES also includes the effects of the Round I water sales from <br />Ruedi concluded on May 13, 1982, for 7,850 AF. The reservoir has a firm <br />marketable yield available for both Round I and Round II sales of 51,500 AF (July <br />I to June 30) based on a hydrologic analysis covering the years 1948 to 1983. <br />Requests for Ruedi water, as of August 1983, exceed 80,000 AF (Table 1.1). <br />The vast majority of requests for Ruedi water was from oil shale interests. <br />The Pi ceance basi n in western Colorado contains large oil shale reserves. <br />Development of the oil shale resource has historically occurred in boom and bust <br />cycles, driven by conditions of the world oil market. While the current world <br />oil market conditions have slowed the development of oil shale projects, energy <br />companies continue to maintain and acquire oil shale resources and to pursue the <br />opmen 0 e ec no ogy. <br />By the year 2000 to 2010, it is reasonable to assume as a basis for <br />projecting West Slope water demand that economic conditions might foster the <br />development of an oil shale industry. A number of studies have been performed <br />estimating the water needs of the oil shale industry including "An Assessment <br />of Oil Shale Technologies," Office of Technology Assessment 1980; and "The <br />Nation's Water Resources 1975-2000, Upper Colorado River Region," U. S. Water <br />Resources Council. Estimates of oil shale water use vary from 100,000 acre-feet <br />to 400,000 acre-feet of additional water depletions from the Colorado River <br />Basin. The water demand could be met through a number of different sources: <br />marketing of water from Ruedi Reservoir, development of water rights held by the <br />energy companies, purchase of agricultural rights, groundwater, and reservoirs <br />such as the proposed Rock Creek/Muddy Creek reservoir project. <br />