Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dr~T ~:::.~y Hit by Trout Group <br />th ",..Ze5l"vpntuaIOt> <br />. at a morl" comprel~ stud' onver \l'al~r needs. but fHI~ <br />F""alef use objectives be do} Lf_lpoPUlatron. land use and <br />arks project. nl" lie ore rushing into the Two <br />The consen"ation g <br />:~~;~ its waler rrq~~~~:~: ~~ l~e Water Board can <br />, Sf' by its customers. g encouraging wise <br />Pnor to thl" Jul}' wal <br />Water Board to d I i>f bond election. TV asked th <br />divl"rsion project foret~ ~nal decisions on its Eagle-P' e <br />"We Ih' k '"'0 ~ears. mey <br />In lhl' logical d '. <br />~rh wm take at leasl this ~~~l:;ntimak!~g process for Two <br />rd~rado Council chairman "A t. me. sars Chris Crosby <br />a 1ze lknver's water su' 'll'0-':e3r delay will not jeo . <br />exceJJent J'ob 01 p' . pply. The "aler Board h" d p- <br />anning and 'd" " one an <br />net'ds and ""1" have an adt>quat pravl,mg for Den\'er's water <br />TV questions ""bv m e s~pp y to last until J985 .. <br />~f enlargement of Chal~:~d ~r;:~e~atitln was oot giv~n 10 <br />(' P ease the waler slora I Just south of Deover to <br />a,Jtern~tjvt'$ such as IrjbUI~~ o:d. And i.t also wonders why <br />::,fat~d mU~ating the main strea~W~Ch would not neces- <br />ns,', {',ration. a\e not bet>n given full <br />Its t}'pical of the Waler . <br />pleases, damn (or dam) the s~~ a!~ll~de of doing what it <br />The loss of this South PI s, Weaver declares <br />Forks would be . atte stream milea t' <br />Wafer Board bus:W~:~~~:I\- b~fhfer blow in Jig~t of 0 o~~ <br />Here the board has . ?" Fork, <br />stream from, Roberts ~:~~n~zed much of ~e river down- <br />~ry and lea\'mg an insulting' . mpletely SPOIling il as a fi~h. <br />ISm ,~I~ng U.S. 285. e} esort for thousands 01 mot~r- <br />/'Iiow the}' leellhl.' did' <br />th,l'}' channelized and ~ow ~~ d? a g~ enough job. First <br />l\eB\'f"r charges. ey re gOing to do it again .. <br />"1t's a Pt'rfec! e:tamoJf." f W ' <br />Irresponsibility ~'hich the' 0 al.er Board environmental <br />Forks." y re trymg to repeat at Two <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Dam Proposal <br />A Nightmare <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />.....m.w.................. By Charlie Meyers <br />IN RECENT YEARS, more than 2,000 miles of COlorado <br />streams have been lost to public fishing. <br />The reasons for the decline are legion: pollution, closure <br />of private land, highway construction abuses, water diver- <br />sions, unconscienable land developments-and dams. <br />H is this last cause which particularly raises the ire of <br />the dedicated strf."am fjsherman. for inundating a stream be- <br />neath hundreds of fl!'E't of water Is to doom it forever, <br />And for Denver area stream fishermen, there's no dam <br />quite so insidious as the proposed Two Forks Dam where the <br />South Platte River and the North Fork of the South Platte <br />join about 25 air miles southwest of Denver. <br />This dam, whiC'h would be built at a cost of $200 million <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation as part of thf." Denver Water <br />Board's storage plans, would merely erase 30 miles of the <br />most productive and heavily used stream fishing in the West. <br />Good Fishing Waters Would Be Lost <br />Water impounded by the towering Two Forks Dam would <br />back reservoir waler all the way past the little town of <br />Deckers. Dro...;ned en route would be the waters loved v.ith a <br />passion by Front Range anglers. <br />The Platte has been overused and abused, but still it <br />contains one of the finest. most sophisticated wild trout popu- <br />lations in the nation. <br />Bul these and other wildlife values along the stream will <br />be permanently eliminated should thf." Water Board and the <br />Bureau or Redamation - hungry for thf." dam - building <br />money to feed its bureaucratic survival twitch-have their <br />way. <br />That they are int!'nt on proceeding, bang tbe <br />consequences, is evident by the fact that Reclamation bas <br />rushed through a hurry-up environml'nlal impact study in <br />only four months, The study originally was to ha\'e taken 18 <br />months. <br />The bureau's haste has been I'riticited roundly by Trout <br />Unlimited, a national conservation organization headquar- <br />tered In [)en\'er. <br />"We suspect a rush coverup on tbis stud}'," charges Bob <br />Weavl'r, executi\'l~ director of TV's Colorado Council. "It's <br />apparent lhey've used only data readily available and that's <br />bardly adequale. Ifs very important tbat a four.season study <br />or the area lInd its uses be donp" <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />