WSP00295 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. .-..- ,,~,.', amount of the Bureau of Reclamation's rights in Green Mountain Reservoir, thereby relieving themselves of the Green Mountain call. The Cities would then construct a 19-mile pipeline to pump Green Mountain water up to Dillon Reservoir and across the divide via Robert's Tunnel. Green Mountain would release 60,000 a.f./year for required instream flow purposes and water would be released from Wolcott Reservoir to generate power and to satisfy the original purposes set forth for Green Mountain in Senate Document 80. Meanwhile, Aurora and Colorado Springs would cancel plans for their Homestake II water project, and Denver would cancel its plans for the Eagle-Piney water system. Water rights already adjudicated for these projects would be transferred downstream for storage in Wolcott Reservoir. Colorado Springs would gain full control of all water presently being diverted by the Homestake I project near Leadville (now owned by both Aurora and Colorado Springs). There are several problems with this plan which need to be addressed before it becomes a feasible alternative: 1) permission to exchange Green Mountain water for Wolcott water needs to be obtained from the U.S. Government and would require an Act of Congress. 2) the status of Denver Water Board's 1971 Eagle River water rights application is still uncertain. At present, the Corps of Engineers is conducting a systemwide and site-specific EIS for the Denver Water Board, The Bureau of. Reclamation is preparing. an EIS _fo:t::ccthe~watet" sales. opt ion, and the Water and PowerAuthbr fiy <is' evallJ.al{ingC:the - "Green Mountain Exchange". Until -these-studies haveb-een- completed, and a decision rendered, Green Mountaih will continue to be a pawn in the "water wars" between east and west. /bvm -4-