Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. ~ <br /> <br />Green Mountain Reservoir, completed in 1943 as part of the <br />Colorado - Big Thompson (CBT) project, has always been the focus <br />of debate between east and west slope water users. In 1933, when <br />plans for the CBT project were being formulated, the first <br />conflicts surfaced. Western slope water users felt they were <br />entitled to 1:1 compensatory storage to offset the transmountain <br />diversions. However, on the other side of the divide, water <br />users were only claiming liability for out-of-priority <br />diversions. After four years of discussion, parties from both <br />areas of the state finally reached a compromise, and in 1937, <br />Congress adopted Senate Document 80 (50 stat. 595) prescribing <br />the relationship between the proposed Green Mountain Reservoir, <br />and existing western slope water rights. <br /> <br />In order to meet all terms of the compromise, Senate <br />Document 80 provided for construction of Green Mountain Reservoir <br />with a total storage capacity of 154,600 a.f, (active storage, <br />146,900 a.f,). Of that amount, 52,000 a.f. was to be reserved <br />for supplying replacement water for out-of-priority diversions. <br />Storage costs for the replacement water were to be paid for by <br />users in northeastern Colorado. The remaining 100,000 a.f. was <br />reserved for powergene.ration; however, water woul.d: be released, <br />free of charge, tosupp1;:Y existil'lgwae-ers users, to supply losses <br />chargeable to delivery of replacement water, and for future <br />domestic and/or irrigation uses. <br /> <br />The ,most senior major water right on the Colorado River is <br />the Grand Valley Irrigation right (1888) which historically has <br />diverted 1000 cfs. The second most senior major right on the <br />River is that of PSCo's Shoshone Hydropower Plant in Glenwood <br />Canyon for 1250 cfs. Since this right is for year-round, <br />non-consumptive use, its fulfillment results in enough water <br />being available to satisfy Grand Valley's demand throughout the <br />year. <br /> <br />In light of this, Senate Document 80 proposed: "Whenever <br />the flow of the Colorado River at the present site of ...Shoshone <br />diversion dam" (measured by the USGS gage at Dotsero)" is less <br />than 1250 cfs, there shall.,.be released...as part of said 52,000 <br />a.f., the amount necessary.,.to fill the vested appropriations of <br />water up to the amount concurrently being...withheld from such <br />vested appropriations by...d ivers ion to the eastern slope. II In <br />addition, Senate Document 80 also provided for future uses by <br />stating, "Water not required for these purposes shall be <br />available for disposal to agencies for the development of the <br />shale oil or other industries." <br /> <br />Although Senate Document 80 simplified the intricacies of <br />the Colorado - Big Thompson project, the operational relationship <br />between Green Mountain, other reservoirs, and subsequent Colorado <br />River basin water users has remained highly complex. <br /> <br />721 <br />grn/mnt <br />