My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />"The PRESIDING OFFICER. Daes the Senatar fram Calarado <br />yield to. the Senatar fram Wiscansin? <br />"Mr. MILLIKIN. I yield. <br />"Mr. LA FOLLETTE. The last statement made by the able <br />Senator from Colorado. is the one which I wished to have made <br />in the RECORD at this time, because I have heard the juniar <br />Senutor from California (Mr. Downey) say over and aver again <br />that. in the light af the terms of this treaty, Mexico wauld have <br />a right subsequently when water delivered to her becames mare <br />saline to raise that question in a court af arbitration. It seems <br />to. me, in view af the language contained in article 10, which <br />provides far the delivery of water and sets forth the amaunt af <br />water, it must be assumed that the men who negotiated the treaty <br />on behalf af Mexico were aware, a s the Senatar says, of the <br />fact that geagraphically Mexico is the last to. receive the water <br />as it carnes dawn the stream. <br />"To my lay mind, it seems perfectly prepasterous to. take <br />the pasitian that subseq'Uently, in the light of this treaty and the <br />lang negotiatians which have taken place in arriving at its terms, <br />Mexico. would ever have a leg to stand on in even suggesting the <br />submission of the question of the quality of the water to a court <br />af arbitratian in succeeding years. <br />"Mr. MILLIKIN. I agree entlrely with the distinguished senior <br />Senatar from Wiscansin, and thank him for hi s very able contribution." <br /> <br />Senator Dawney answers Senator N'lillikin beginning at page 3157 and <br /> <br />ending an 3158 in the fallowing language: <br /> <br />"Mr. DOWNEY. . <br />'----------"Tfied'fstTnguis]led Senator fromColorada (Mr. Millikin)-- <br />and I do not doubt his good faith--tried to. persuade the Senate <br />that the return flaw which Mexico. would receive wauld be only <br />a little more saline than before we had used the water. Mr. <br />President, that is nonsense. First, we must understand that <br />canditians in the lower and upper basin States as regards <br />salinity are tatally different. When this water has its genesis <br />in the mountains of Utah, Wyoming, or Calorada, it is crystal <br />clear. Most af the lands in those States are not very saline, <br />sa water in Calorada and Utah--or at least in Colorado and <br />Wyaming--can be used and re-used with aut becoming very <br />saline. <br />"The distinguished Senator from Colorado overlaoked anather <br />impartant point in his discussion of salinity, as did the experts <br />af the State Department. They submitted figures before the Committee <br /> <br />B 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.