My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00291
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00291
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix B - Water Quality A Missing
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,. <br /> <br />to cover that, The treaty provides that the waters shall be .. <br />ailocated from any source whatsoever. I am parl'iphrasing; You <br />will remember the language. The other is, that Mexico shall <br />have a right to use no more than 1,500,000 acre-feet 'for any <br />purpose whatsoever'. Now, that 'any purpose whatsoever' has <br />material significance. Under this language we believe that <br />Iviexico could not call upon the United States for any more water <br />than 1,500,000 acre-feet for dilution purposes. She has renounced <br />all claim to any wat8r, except 1 ,500,000 acre-f8et, for any pur- <br />pOS8 whatsoev8r. " <br /> <br />On page 323 Senator Downey asked the question the import of which was could <br /> <br />we deliver 500,000 or 750,000 acre-feet of water which would not be of value <br /> <br />for irrigation purposes. Tipton's reply was as follows: <br /> <br />"Yes, sir; I do state to the committee, that that is my opinion. <br />It is not my own view, Senator, that the amount of return flow that <br />Mexico will be receiving will be of unusable quality. . ." <br /> <br />Following the above statement by Tipton, Senator Downey and Tipton engaged in <br /> <br />an 8xchange which reads: <br /> <br />"Senator DOWNEY. And you aw very poSitiV8 that the treaty <br />does not give any guaranty to Mexico that the water we deliver <br />he,' shall be of a quality that she shall use? <br />"!Vir. TIPTON. Yes, sir. Understand, I am not an attorney. <br />I cannot appraise th8 legal rights of M8xico und8r the treaty. <br />Howev8L,--Ldid-ba.ve_the_privilege_oLparticipating_v8r.y_actively - - - -- <br />in th8 n8gotiations, and I can say of my own knowl8dge that <br />this question was a major qU8stion, and that M8Xico understands <br />very thoroughly what th8 language of the treaty m8ans. <br />"Senator DOvVNEY. Now, Mr. Tipton, ther8 is no such <br />phras8 as this: That M8Xico agrees to tak8 the 1,500,000 <br />acr8-f8et r8gardless of its quality or usability? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. No, sir; cGrtainly not. <br />"S8nator DOWNEY. The languag8 you r8fer to, as I under- <br />stand you, is this: That M8xico shall b8 guarantGed th8 right <br />to 1,500,000 acre-feet of water from any and all sources; is <br />that right? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. That is part of the languag8. <br />"Senator DOWNEY. That is th8 languag8 you refer to? <br />"Mr. TIPTON. Yes, that is correct. <br /> <br />B 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.