My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00287
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/23/1998
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Biological Assessment of a Beach/Habitat Building Flow from Glen Canyon Dam in 1998
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the SWWF in Grand Canyon. Stevens et al. (1996) studied habitat changes at four <br />historic SWWF nest sites in Grand Canyon. Fluvial marshes associated with these <br />sites were dominated by common reed, horsetail and cattail. SWWF research activities <br />associated with that BHBF included verifying stage-to-discharge relations, quantifying <br />flow depth and velocity at nest sites, and determining nest site and foraging habitat <br />structure, litter/understory characteristics, and nesting success. <br /> <br />The 1996 BHBF impacts on Grand Canyon SWWF habitat were reported by Stevens et <br />al. (1996). Nest stand vegetation impacts were nominal: two stands were slightly <br />scoured, and three sites sustained a slight reduction in ground cover and/or branch <br />abundance at <0.6 m above the ground; however, no reduction in branch abundance or <br />alteration of stand composition occurred, and the BHBF did not inundate the bases of <br />any historic nest trees. Impacts on marsh foraging habitats were more severe, with <br />decreases in area of 1 % to >72%. Two of four SWWF sites regained vegetated area <br />during the summer of 1996, while two other marshes sustained slight additional losses <br />in cover through the 1996 growing season. <br /> <br />The species has been given special protection status by the Game and Fish <br />Department in Arizona. <br /> <br />Life Requisites <br /> <br />SWWF arrive in the Grand Canyon area in mid-May, but may be confused with another <br />subspecies, the more common E.t. brewsteri, which migrates through to more northern <br />breeding grounds (Aldrich 1951; Unitt 1987). E.t. brewsteri sings during migration, <br />making sub-specific distinctions difficult until mid-June (Brown 1991b). Males arrive <br />earlier than females and set up territories. The characteristic territorial song is a "fitz- <br />bew," most frequently heard in the morning before 10 AM (Tibbitts et aI., 1994). There <br />is little evidence that the four subspecies may be differentiated by characteristics of this <br />song (McCarthey, et al. 1997). <br /> <br />The SWWF in Grand Canyon occupy sites with average vegetation canopy height and <br />density (Brown and Trossett 1989). SWWF commonly breed and forage in dense, <br />multistoried riparian vegetation near surface water or moist soil (Whitmore 1977, Sferra <br />et aI., 1995), along low gradient streams (Sogge 1995). Nesting in the Grand Canyon <br />typically occurs in non-native Tamarix approximately 4-7 m tall (13-23 feet), with a <br />dense volume offoliage 0-4 m from the ground (Tibbetts et aI., 1994). SWWF <br />commonly and preferentially nest in saltcedar in upper Grand Canyon (Brown 1988), <br />and nested in saltcedar in Glen Canyon before completion of the Glen Canyon Dam <br />(Behle and Higgins 1959). <br /> <br />Although habitat is not limiting in Grand Canyon (Brown and Trossett 1989), required <br />patch size is not known. The 1997 nesting record from lower Grand Canyon <br />demonstrates that this species can colonize new habitat; however, that habitat is <br />influenced by Lower Basin Lake Mead management. Present data indicate no impacts <br /> <br />1998 GCD Beach/Habitat Building Flow 20 <br /> <br />Biological Assessment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.