My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00287
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:35 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/23/1998
Author
USDOI-BOR
Title
Biological Assessment of a Beach/Habitat Building Flow from Glen Canyon Dam in 1998
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />dam construction; <br /> <br />. the estimated loss of KAS habitat (10.27% to 14,0%) contains an estimated <br />8.4% of the total Vasey's Paradise KAS population, which would be lost during <br />45,000 cfs BHBF(s) in 1998; and <br /> <br />. the vegetation and the KAS population will re-colonize the scoured area in ~2 yr. <br /> <br />Reclamation acknowledges that take of any amount of an endangered species is a <br />matter of serious concern, and will work with the Service to mitigate impacts by: <br /> <br />. translocation of KAS, as was done in 1996 <br /> <br />. assisting the Service with KAS recovery activities <br /> <br />The 1996 B.O, incidental take statement allowed for mitigation of take through <br />relocation of KAS to a position within the habitat above the 45,000 cfs stage. Moving of <br />snails may be the best long-term management strategy, as it is efficient, inexpensive, <br />and continues to be the most obvious means of mitigating BHBF impacts. Despite <br />concerns about detrimental effects on moved KAS resulting from disturbance due to <br />handling and the potential for increased competition among the snails, the Kanab <br />Ambersnaillnteragency Workgroup (1997a) reported few if any negative impacts of the <br />1996 BHBF related to translocation within the habitat. In the long-term, Reclamation <br />favors focusing resources on improving understanding of the ecology of the species to <br />help with recovery, establishment of additional populations, and refining overall <br />ecosystem management strategies, <br /> <br />In addition, Reclamation will monitor the population and its habitat both pre- and post- <br />test flow, as required by the incidental take statements in the 1994, 1996 and 1997 <br />biological opinions, to assist in defining the species' response to high flows. <br />Reclamation believes the benefits of BHBF's to other Colorado River ecosystem <br />resources outweighs the relatively minor impacts to KAS and its habitat resulting from <br />planned high flows, <br /> <br />HUMPBACK CHUB SPECIES ACCOUNT <br /> <br />Distribution and Abundance <br /> <br />The Grand Canyon supports the only successfully reproducing HBC population in the <br />lower Colorado River basin (Kaeding and Zimmerman 1983, Valdez 1995, Valdez and <br />RyeI1997). Valdez (1995) identified nine distinct aggregations in the mainstream <br />Colorado River downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, including: 30-Mile, the Little <br />Colorado River (LCR) confluence area, Lava/Chuar to Hance Rapids, Bright Angel <br />Creek mouth, Shinumo Creek mouth, Stephens Aisle, Middle Granite Gorge, Havasu <br />Creek mouth and Pumpkin Spring. <br /> <br />1998 GCD Beach/Habitat Building Flow 12 <br /> <br />Biological Assessment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.