Laserfiche WebLink
<br />State of Colorado . <br />state of New Mexico <br />State of utah . . <br />State of Wyoming <br /> <br />51. 75 percent <br />ll.25 percent <br />23.00 percent <br />14."00 percent <br /> <br /> <br />e <br />w <br />CV <br />I-" <br /> <br />HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />The compact, in effect, cleared the way for legislation authoriz- <br />ing the construction of major projects such as Boulder Canyon project, <br />and it also Cleared the way for compacts or agreements within the Upper <br />and Lower Basins to further divide the water among the states. <br /> <br />2.. Mexican Treaty <br /> <br />The treaty with Mexico, signed in 1944, provides basically for a <br />guaranteed annual delivery by the United States to Mexico of 1,500,000 <br />acre-feet of Colorado River water. <br /> <br />3. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact <br /> <br />With the water allocated to the Upper Basin by the Colorado River <br />Compact and with the Mexican Treaty signed, the Upper Basin States be- <br />gan negotiations which resulted in the signing of the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin Compact in 1948. Under the terms of the compact, Arizona <br />is permitted to use 50,000 acre-feet of water annually from the upper <br />Colorado River system, and the remaining water is apportioned to the <br />other Upper Basin States in the following percentages: <br /> <br />Congress had previously been unwilling to approve projects without <br />assurance that a water supply would be available, so this division of <br />water among the states permitted development in the Upper Basin to pro- <br />ceed and resulted primarily in the a.uthorization of most of the Federal <br />projects above Lee Ferry that are mentioned in this report. <br /> <br />Neither of the compacts specifically mention water quality, but it <br />has been recognized as a factor to be considered in developing projects, <br />and water guality studies have been required by recent legislation au- <br />thorizing the construction of projects in the upper Basin. <br /> <br />4. Arizona v. California Suit in the Supreme Court <br /> <br />The States of the Lower Basin have never agreed to a compact for <br />the division of the use of the waters of the Lower Colorado River Basin. <br />The state of Arizona filed suit in the Supreme Court of the United states <br />in October 1952 against the State of California and others for the deter- <br />mination of the rights to use the waters of the Lower Colorado River sys- <br />tem. The Supreme Court gave its decision on June 3, 1963, and issued a <br />decree on March 9, 1964, providing for the apportionment of the use of <br />the waters of the main stream of the Colorado River below Lee Ferry among <br />the states of Arizona, California, and Nevada. The States of Arizona and <br /> <br />12 <br />