Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Al:Af:r.as OF HATE,'R STUDY <br />cmrr:;RInO .T','n."f OPr.1lAT!ON' OF ~'TIE t::('LlJliBUS <br />PlATTE VAIJ.,EY AlID TRI-CCUJ;TY PR:J,JFCTS <br /> <br />Shoot 1 of 6 Sheets <br /> <br />DaBlc Assumptions, <br /> <br />1. ColtnDbua Project 18 ,.un of the river plDnt. Da11y regulatlon <br />atorage only. <br /> <br />~.. <br />2. Prlrr.nry pl1bUC b~cl'it. of too :l'Utherlsnd and Trl..county l'rtljectB <br />18 tho i'urniahiDg of' "Ui,ple::u:mtal irrie;aticm W!l"!;f.lr. <br /> <br />3. All prior ri[.lrts to 'too \<later of' tM l'or1:h and South i'1at'te <br />Rivera must bo satlsf'ied. <br /> <br />Concluded that. <br /> <br />Columbus 10 base load plan"!;. <br />Sutoorlll11d and Tri..t::o\l!l.ty plants are base l04d with regard to <br />wntel" flD"nh11ed for irrigation. and l.U1storable water such <br />as flow of '~outh Platt". <br /> <br />Physioal Limitations. <br /> <br />1. L1m1t or ofUlal o'lpaol ties. <br />2. Limitation of storats by Sutherland Projeot due to ~cessive lossee. <br />3. Use of F.1r.r;sley r.or river atorSl;e to allow Jefr",,,, snd .JomBOI1 <br />R08ervoirs to be used far flexibility and maximum utilisation of <br />flood we-tors fran, the ~Jouth Platto RlvEll". <br /> <br />Coltllllbus ProJeot. (Loup Rher) <br /> <br />1. Canal oapao1ty .. 3100 s.f'. <br />2. 110t loss by seepage ADd evapcxration - a:.. <br />3. Tot&! bsad .. ~ feet. <br />4. One s.t'. equals 9.5 IDJ. <br />5. One A.F. eqUllls 115 rom. <br />6. Plmt; ef'fioiency _ 88.Z;. <br /> <br />Uatal" for floestm1; I'IQ1n Plat;te D1 tohos <br /> <br />1. Only 1rr1~tiCll1 divcrSiCltlEl o<msldol"ed (Actllal 1930-38) <br />2. Uoe Tri"::oUll.ty syetem as conveyor Ins'tead of RIver. <br />3. All deliveries to Na!n Platte ditchee Olln be run thro~h Jaffe..,. <br />Plant. <br />/.;. Del1verles to 2lm CNlek IlIld c.oomoy Canals can be l"\lI1 tilrouth <br />JOllllSOll l"l.!lll.ta. but as a. fllotc:lr 01' sal'ety. bas not been treated <br />thus in thia I!tudy. <br />