Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Oi1aaas <br /> <br />The knowledge regarding stream impacts from roads and the technology to <br />prevent damage has been around for at least a century. "Ruinous sand" was <br />known to be a major factor in the decline of fisheries at least as early as <br />the 1930's. Forest Service handbooks in the 1930's and 40's dealt extensively <br />with erosion control and reducing the time bare soil was,exposed to rain <br />storms. Even laws passed as early as 1911 recognized stream sedimentation as <br />a major problem. The concern, specific to roads, was finally brought to a <br />head with the revision of CWA s404 in 1977. <br /> <br />Although there is some disagreement as to who should do what, the law itself <br />is pretty clear about requiring best management practices, assuring no stream <br />impairment without a S404 permit, and minimizing aquatic cumulative effects. <br />A few of the more pertinent regulations include: locating roads far enough <br />away from water bodies to minimize damage, installing road crossings to <br />withstand the expected floods, not disrupting aquatic species migration, <br />stabilizing road fills during and after construction to prevent erosion, <br />removing temporary road fills completely when the road is no longer needed, <br />and avoiding discharges into critical habitat or special aquatic sites. <br /> <br />Good management systems encourage the types of pollution control and land use <br />that make future pollution control easier. This has to include operating with <br />low total yields and full control of temporary pollutant yields. In the case <br />of sediment, there are no temporary effects - sediment doesn't evaporate and <br />the fish don't eat it - so it remains part of the stream system. The age-old <br />practice of flushing is not a solution, but merely a way to pass-the-buck down <br />stream, and in the case of reservoir sedimentation, to future generations. <br /> <br />Photo Plate 1 <br />These photos indicate some rather typical solutions when the stream is in the <br />way. Although both construction sites were expected to "heal," that has not <br />happened. In the upper photo, road ditch water continues to gully the side <br />cast material. In the lower photo, bank erosion on this 25 year old channel <br />change on Interstate 70 in Colorado, is still active. <br /> <br />Photo Plate 2 <br />This is a comparison of two reaches on the same stream. The lower photo shows <br />conditions 25 years after road, construction moved the stream. Major erosion <br />problems developed immediately and riprap was added to stabilize the banks. <br />But even after 25 years, and a lot of riprap, stability problems continue. <br />One could speculate that the entire channel reach will be riprapped by the <br />time bank stability is actually achieved. Notice also there is still a near <br />total lack of stream bank vegetation which affects several aquatic processes <br />that are dependent on organic matter and influenced by heat and light. <br /> <br />Text Page 6 <br /> <br />iL,_<~ <br />