Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />101. '9: Page I <br /> <br />ion acrc-feet <br />,d priority is <br />Lower Basin <br />)Iex, but the <br />s fair: <br /> <br />-'owell is not to <br />: drained while <br />in general hut <br />: 10 b< filled to <br />f the most a- <br />19<, and Lake <br />active storag~ <br />the two rcser- <br /> <br />,'s statement, <br />,ile the bill is <br />justment be, <br />: way or an, <br /> <br />provision of <br />op in having <br />~ amount of <br />~e difficulties <br />f the amount <br />~ficiency and <br />:e Ferry and <br />the compact <br />, a deficiency <br /> <br />idency when <br />ivc use, even <br />Ipply may be <br />ld there may <br />Ie 8.5 million <br />ct apportion- <br />J ppcr Basin. <br />lac-feet, dis- <br />t the flow at <br />: total supply <br /> <br />-':uvcmba '966] <br /> <br />THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />gates 15 million acre-feet, enough to supply all demands but not <br />~h to supply the article I1I(a) and III(b) apportionments. Can the <br />~o;r Basin withhold all but 750,000 acre-feet of the 3.5 million acre-feet <br />PGlen Canyon and require the Lower Basin to cut back its existing uses <br />~:. i5o,ooo aae-feet? Taken alone, ar?c1e I~I(c) see~s to give ~ ~flirma- <br />ti~'e answer. Article II1(e) may mod~y thiS conclUSIOn by ~equITillg the <br />!rase of water which the Upper Basill cannot apply to agncultural and <br />~omestic uses. Once again the question is whether the two compact sections <br />arc interdependent or independent. The commonsense answer seems to be <br />to gi,'e article 1lI (c) primacy in order to avoid economic loss. Doing so, <br />howe\'er, renders the "surplus" pro\'isions of article III (c) virtually in- <br />operative. <br />Another difficulty presented by the application of article II1(c) is only <br />partI}' attributable to the compact negotiators' draftsmanship. The Mexi- <br />an treaty requires annual deliveries, while the Upper Basin's III(d) obli- <br />""tion is calculated in continuous periods of ten years. A question arises <br />whether the Upper Basin can obtain a credit against its II1(c) obligation <br />b)' the delivery to Lee Ferry of water in excess of its III(d) obligation. Sup- <br />pose that on October 1, 1964, the aggregate flow at Lee Ferry for the pre- <br />,'ious ten years was 85 million acre-feet, but that the flow for the water year <br />'!P3-1g64 was only 6 million acre-feet. Assume further that, as the term is <br />interpreted, there is a deficiency under article III(c). Has the Upper Basin <br />solisfied its obligation by providing an average annual excess of 1 million <br />aerdeet of water? Since, until recently, the only sizable storage on the <br />main stream was at Hoover Dam, it seems fair to credit the Upper Basin <br />Cor excess deliveries which the Lower Basin can store and use to supply <br />Mexico. However, article III(c) seems to define surplus and deficiency by <br />reference to articles III(a) and (b), in which the water accounting is on <br />an annual basis. <br />Again, these ambiguities of language do not create merely academic <br />problems. From the time of the signing of the Mexican treaty, if not long <br />before," there have been conflicting interpretations of article III(c)." <br /> <br />4. Water quality. <br /> <br />The compact contains no explicit provision regarding water quality. <br />Article III (d) speaks only of delivery of 75 million acre-feet of water in <br />each ten-year pcriod. The nearest approach the compact makes to the ques- <br /> <br />66. $". ~.,.. ~(:rbert Hooyu's analysis of the compact in answC' to questions by Representative <br />Clrl Haydrn, qUeslJOD no. 15. 64 Cowc. he. 2710-13 (1923), r~primed in Wilbur &. Ely, op. tit. <br />"F. DOlt 62, at A38. <br />87. Sc~ H~tI,.in,s on lh~ Tuaty W'-/h M~riro, supra not~ 60, aE 596-600, 604-06, 847-48, 1128. <br />. Tb~ nccnE heuings on th~ Crntral AnzoIU Project have produced th~ sam~ conflicts. S~~ H~ar- <br />,-,, 011 S. 16j8 (Cnrtral Ar;zofJIJ Projut), ruprll DOEc 49. aE 487"'"'94. <br />