Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,~ <br /> <br />c'; <br /> <br />Statement (GCD-EIS, Bureau of Reclamation 1995) and 1996 Record of Decision to operate <br />Glen Canyon Dam as described in the preferred alternative of the EIS, with slight modification, <br /> <br /> <br />The Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 (pL. 102-575) requires the Secretary of the Interior <br />to operate Glen Canyon Dam "...in such a manner as to protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and <br />improve the values for which Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National Recreation <br />Area were established, including, but not limited to natural and cultural resources and visitor <br />use, "Section 1802(a)]. The operation as described in the ROD is designed to preserve a mass <br />balance of sand, primarily for use as camping beaches and substrate for riparian vegetation, <br /> <br />t', <br /> <br />. <br />i <br /> <br />The ROD selected the modified low fluctuating flow alternative (MLFF) as the operation of Glen <br />Canyon most likely to meet the stated goals of the GCD-EIS, The MLFF has a minimum release <br />of 5,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) between 7:00 p,m, and 7:00 a,m. (at night), and 8,000 cfs as a <br />minimum release from 7:00 a.m, to 7:00 p,m, (day time flows), The maximum release is 25,000 <br />cfs, with a maximum daily flow range of 5,000 cfs, 6,000 cfs or 8,000 cfs, depending on the <br />monthly release volume (during low, medium or high volume months, respectively), Ramping. <br />rates under the ROD are 4,000 cfs/hr up and 1,500 cfs/hr down, The ROD also provides for a I <br />to 2 week-long beach/habitat-building flow, It also allows for beach/habitat-building flows to be <br />considered in other months, to coincide with late summer rainfall events, The high, steady, <br />releases will be used to evaluate the applicability of high flows as a strategy for future adaptive <br />management oCthe Colorado River, High flows are intended to restore part of the natural range <br />of variability under which the ecosystem evolved. <br /> <br />~.:' <br /> <br />l'-; <br /> <br />~; <br /> <br />~::.: <br />~:~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />;:;', <br />:,~', <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />Flooding was an essential characteristic of the pre-dam river, Current dam operations have <br />virtually eliminated this dynamic element of the natural ecological process, Although a program <br />of reduced daily flow fluctuation (Interim Operations) was implemented in 1991 to conserve a <br />mass balance of tributary-de1;ived sand, occasional high flows are thought to be required to <br />restore high elevation sand deposits and characteristic aquatic habitats, such as backwaters, <br />Backwaters are used as rearing habitats by young native fish, <br /> <br />i'~.' <br />,,-,;- <br />~ft <br /> <br />:.t.:.~ <br />~.~ <br /> <br />. <br />",,,.. <br />..." <br />':'C <br />~.,:r. <br />',',.,; <br /> <br />The proposed 1997 Fall Test flow will improve understanding of how floOding influences <br />ecosystem.geomorphology, biological and cultura1 (archeological and traditional land use) <br />resources, and ecosystem processes. Data collected during the 1997 Fall Test flow will <br />demonstrate in conjunction with other test data the extent to which planned flooding can be used <br />as an ecosystem management tool. A previous test of a beach-habitat building flow was <br />conducted in March, 1996. <br /> <br />:"!:,", <br />'j,., <br />~ <br />~~ <br />~l <br /> <br />'"" <br />~4 <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />,>,; <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OP THE 1997 FALL TEST FLOW <br /> <br /> <br />Description of Flow <br /> <br />The 1997 Fall Test flow is scheduled to begin at noon with upramp releases at a rate of 4,000 <br />cubic foot per second (cis) each hour until the desired release rate of 31,000 cfs is reached at <br /> <br />2 <br />