Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bald eagles concentrate at Nankoweap Creek in Grand Canyon, during the spawning rund of non- <br />native trout to take advantage of a readily available and abundant food source. During the <br />remaining portions of the year,. eagles have been observed as distributed through the canyon in <br />relatively small numbers. At N ankoweap Creek, wintering bald eagles preferentially capture <br />rainbow trout in the shallow creek, rather than in the mainstream where foraging success is low <br />(Brown 1993, Sogge et aI., 1995). Bald eagles at Nankoweap Creek prefer roosting and feeding <br />areas that are relatively free of vegetation. The eagle population there consists of all age classes, <br />with considerable piracy and other interactions between individuals (Brown and Leibfried 1992). <br />The ease and relative safety offoraging in Nankoweap Creek aff'ordswintering bald eagles at <br />Nankoweap Creek the opportunity to accumulate energy reserves needed for their long, <br />northward migration flights and initiation of nesting. <br /> <br />Effects of the Proposed Action on Bald Eagle <br /> <br />The proposed action should not alter the food base or habitat of the bald eagle. Only resident <br />birds are expected to present at this time, with the majority bald eagle that winter in the canyon <br />only beginning to migrate to the area During the portion of this 48 hour test when the releases <br />are at power plant capacity, foraging in the main stem Colorado River may be more difficult. <br />Current weather conditions would most likely be similar to the fluctuations the birds will <br />experience with the October test flow. <br /> <br />The test flow will have no effect on the wintering bald eagle population in the Colorado River in <br />Grand Canyon. <br /> <br />PEREGRINE FALCON <br /> <br />Distribution and Abundanu <br /> <br />The peregrine falcon (Falconidae: ~ perearinu~) is a federally listed endangered raptor, which <br />has declined dramatically as a result of the biological concentration of pesticide residues in prey <br />species, and resulting eggshell thinning (U.S. Fish and Wtldlife Service 1984) and the increase in <br />food base in Grand Canyon. The population in the Rocky Mountain/southwest region declined <br />from 180 pairs prior to 1915 to 55 pairs in 1983, largely as a result ofDDT/DDE thinning of <br />. eggshells (U.S. Fish and Wtldlife 1984). <br /> <br />The Grand Canyon peregrine population was low in the mid-1910's (Ellis and Monson 1989), but <br />increased dramatically in the 1980's, following recovery efforts by the U.S. Fish and Wtldlife <br />Service (1984). At present, the Grand Canyon supports the largest breeding population of <br />peregrine falcons in the cotenninous United States (Brown 1991a). Surveys for nesting peregrine <br />falcons in 1988 and 1989 revealed 28 and 58 pairs, in 15% and 24% of the park, respectively. <br />Habitat-based estimation of the potential number of peregrine falcons in Grand Canyon suggested <br />that as many as 96 pair existed in Grand Canyon in 1989. <br /> <br />23 <br />