My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00217
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:17 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054.100
Description
Water Salvage - Water Salvage Study - HB 91-1154
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/7/1991
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Salvage Previous Drafts - An Analysis of Water Salvage Issues in Colorado - Various Drafts - Part III
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002056 <br /> <br />When stream flows and groundwater levels are changed, water dependent <br />environmental values are impacted, some being degraded and others enhanced as a result <br />of efficiency improvements. <br /> <br />As explained at Section VIA, the water supply impacts of efficiency changes depend <br />on basin characteristics and the relative priority of the improved right. Clearly, when <br />, <br />consumptive use is decreased additional water is available in the basin. Depending on <br />current and future needs in the basin this water may get consumed by others or may remain <br />in the stream to improve aquatic and riparian values. Where return flows are decreased it <br />is less dear what will occur. If those return flows are reduced by reducing diversion <br />volumes it might be concluded that stream flows are improved. Actually, the lower <br />diversion rate may only make it possible for some other upstream user to now divert and <br />consume more water, in fact decreasing stream flows. If no upstream use of the reduced <br />diversions occurs, the instream flow will be increased below the headgate down to the reach <br />where return flows historically occurred. . Below that point annual flows should be similar <br />to historical levels, but tbe monthly pattern would vary, returning to a more natural flow <br />distribution. In Colorado the pre-irrigation flow distribution often saw peak flows in spring <br />, <br />and dry streams in the surruner and fall. Irrigation return flows have changed intermittent <br />streams to perennial streams with a year-round water supply; improved efficiency may <br />reverse this trend. <br /> <br />Another environmental resource impacted by irrigation efficiency changes is wetlands. <br />Losses from irrigation systems can augment tbe water supply for natural wetlands and more <br />often result in creation of new wetlands entirely dependent on irrigation for their water <br />supply. Water tbat would otherWise return to the surface stream is consumed by wetland <br />vegetation, creating a stream depletion. The incidental consumptive use occurring within <br />an irrigation system is often reduced with a corresponding loss of wetland acreage. Indeed, <br />the Federal Salinity Control Program has had difficulties in mitigating the wetlands impacts <br />associated With its projects. <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.