My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00209
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:35:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.500
Description
Platte River Recovery Plan
Basin
South Platte
Date
5/30/2000
Author
CWCB
Title
Draft Water Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Option 3: Groundwater Irrigation. Farmers would be paid to put in wells and use <br />groundwater as opposed to surface water to irrigate. Reductions in storage water <br />diversions could be stored in the Lake McConaughy EA when storage is available and <br />released as needed for the Program. <br /> <br />Option 4: Conjunctive Use. A conjunctive use project under CNPPID's system would <br />consist of shallow wells that discharge directly into CNPPID's distribution system and a <br />recharge system of wells, pits, or drains located in the same area. Each year, in late fall <br />and winter, flows at the Johnson #2 Power Plant that exceed target flows would be <br />diverted through CNPPID's distribution system for recharge to the local groundwater <br />aquifer. The groundwater aquifer would be recharged to a pre-determined level. Each <br />spring and summer, an equivalent amount of water would be pumped for irrigation. <br />Pumping during the irrigation season would replace irrigation releases from Lake <br />McConaughy. <br /> <br />o On-Site Hydrologic Effects: <br /> <br />The options described above could be implemented to yield a total of 3,000 ac-ftlyr for <br />the Program. Each of these projects has been analyzed independently of each other. <br />Ultimately, only one of these projects or a combination of these projects will be <br />implemented for a total yield of 3,000 ac-ftlyr. <br /> <br />The following table summarizes how anyone of these projects could be implemented in <br />the areas described above to yield 3,000 ac-ftlyr. It was assumed that implementation of <br />anyone of these options will reduce the water supply for the others. However, it is <br />possible that one option or a combination of these options could be implemented to yield <br />a total of 3,000 ac-ftlyr. For active groundwater pumping from high groundwater areas it <br />was assumed that 600 ac-ft would be pumped each month from May through September <br />during periods of target flow shortage, for an annual total of 3,000 ac-ft. For passive <br />lowering of the groundwater table and groundwater irrigation the monthly distribution of <br />reductions in surface water consumptive use was based on the monthly distribution of <br />diversions into the Phelps County Canal. For a conjunctive use project, 3,000 ac-ft will <br />be diverted to recharge in November, and 600 ac-ft would be pumped each month from <br />May through September to replace irrigation storage releases. For options 2 through 4, <br />the yield to the Platte River represents storage increases in the Lake McConaughy EA <br />which can be released to meet target flow shortages. <br /> <br />C:\Dmfi Wnler Action Pllm {Mlly 30, 2(00)\wnpc repon (Version 6 BND2)-.doc <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.