Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 111-18 <br /> <br /> Land FaIlowinl! - Reductions in Consumptive Use (ae-ft) <br />Month Reach 10 Reach 14 Reach 15 Reach 16 Reach 17 Reach 18 Reach 19 <br />October 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />November 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />December 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />January 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />February 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />March 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />April 5 7 6 6 10 8 3 <br />May 10 16 13 12 24 18 7 <br />June 89 107 119 139 267 326 285 <br />July 210 246 282 342 775 976 817 <br />August 188 221 253 315 625 791 705 <br />September 15 23 18 24 44 44 29 <br />Annual 517 619 690 839 1744 2164 1846 <br /> <br />OPtion 4: Changes in Irrigation Techniques <br /> <br />In Reaches 17, 18, and 19 a large portion of return flows return to the Republican River <br />Basin, accrete to the groundwater mound or return to the Platte Ri ver below the critical <br />habitat. It was assumed that 50 percent of the return flows do not return to the Platte <br />River above the critical habitat. A 1993 survey conducted by CNPPID indicated that <br />about 50 percent of the surface supplied irrigated acreage within their district is irrigated <br />with techniques that have substantial potential for increases in efficiency. The distribution <br />of land involved in each reach was based on the distribution of acres irrigated with <br />surface supplies. The number of acres that were assumed to be included in this program <br />are summarized in the following table. <br /> <br />Table III-19 <br />Chan es in Irri ation Techni ues <br />Acres Included in <br />Pro ram (ac) <br />6,800 <br />8,700 <br />7,400 <br />22,900 <br /> <br />Reach <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />Total <br /> <br />The tables below show the proposed average monthly reductions in diversions and the <br />reductions in on-farm deliveries for each reach due to efficiency improvements. Although <br />the reductions in diversions were assigned to a reach based on the distribution of irrigated <br />acres, in some cases the reductions would occur further upstream depending on the <br />location of the mainstem headgate. The amount delivered on-farm was based on the <br />average conveyance loss for each reach. Data on conveyance losses was based on <br />county-level information obtained from the USGS Water Use Data for 1995. <br /> <br />C:\Druft: Water Action Plan (May 30. 2000)\wapc report (Version 6 BND2hdoc <br /> <br />31 <br />