My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00209
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:35:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.500
Description
Platte River Recovery Plan
Basin
South Platte
Date
5/30/2000
Author
CWCB
Title
Draft Water Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Option 6: J-2 Forebay Reservoir. This site is located southeast of Lexington in Gosper <br />County in the Plum Creek basin, south of the J-2 Forebay on the south side of the Canal. <br />This reservoir would be gravity fed fromthe Supply Canal. The reservoir capacity is <br />estimated to be 3,436 ac-ft, <br /> <br />o Basic Description: <br /> <br />Re-regulating reservoirs capture Platte River water beyond that required for irrigation <br />deliveries and mainstem instream flows during periods of excess flows at the critical <br />habitat. In general, water would be diverted from the Central District Supply Canal <br />during periods of excess and released during periods of shortage at the critical habitat. In <br />the case of the Jeffrey Canyon and the J-2 Forebay Reservoirs water would be supplied <br />from Jeffrey Reservoir and J-2 Forebay, respectively, as opposed to the Canal. CNPPID <br />is proposing to re-regulate flows in their system, in which case diversions will not be <br />increased or decreased, only return flows will change. <br /> <br />o On-Site Hydrologic Effects: <br /> <br />The HDR Report was relied on for yield estimates. Nebraska is reserving 50 percent of <br />the yield to offset future depletions, in which case only 50 percent of the yield is <br />available to the Program. The on-site yields presented have not been discounted, <br />therefore, the EIS team will need to consider the reservation of water for Nebraska's <br />offset purposes in determining the scores associated with these reservoirs, <br /> <br />HDR developed a spreadsheet to analyze the flow regime of each potential reservoir. <br />Reservoir operations were modeled on a daily basis, Daily operation is possible due to <br />the close proximity of the reservoir to the habitat. Days of excess can occur in months <br />that the monthly flow does not exceed monthly target flows, in which case, the reservoir <br />could be operated to store on days of excess and release on days of shortage. These <br />reservoirs can take advantage of short-term excesses and shortages in a more efficient <br />manner than other alternati ves that are further upstream. <br /> <br />The following assumptions and operating rules were used by HDR to determine the yield <br />and timing associated with these reservoirs, <br /> <br />. No dead pool was accounted for. All reservoirs were allowed to drop until they <br />were dry, <br /> <br />· Type of year for purposes of defining target flows (wet, average, or dry) is known. <br /> <br />· Travel time from Overton to Grand Island is two days, Historic flows at Overton <br />were used to determine the amount of water that should be stored or released from <br />the reservoirs to meet the target flows at Grand Island. <br /> <br />C:\Draft Waler Action Plnn (MllY 30, 2()(x))\wnpc repOlt (Version 6 BNOO)-.doc <br /> <br />II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.