My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00190
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:34:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/2/1999
Author
URS Greiner Woodward
Title
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley - Delivery Order Number 86
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SECTIONFIVE <br /> <br />Piping Plover <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />1 <br />~ <br /> <br />wide. horizontal visibility; protection from terrestrial predators; isolation from human <br />disturbance; and sufficient protection from rises in river levels. <br /> <br />Piping plovers are considered monogamous (having one mate) but will readily change mates and <br />territories following nest failure and between years. After arriving at the breeding grounds, the <br />male scapes several shallow, bowl-shaped depressions in the sand while vigorously calling to the <br />female. The female then inspects each scape and selects one in which to lay her eggs. Nests are <br />located on elevated areas with unvegetated sand, gravel, and cobble substrate, and they are <br />sometimes placed near objects such as small pieces of drifrwood, stones, or bones which may <br />make the nest less noticeable to predators. As stated previously, unobsoucted views are essential <br />so adults can detect potential threats. Piping plovers usually lay four eggs which are olive to dull <br />colored and are evenly marked with fine splotches of black. Both sexes share incubation duties <br />which last an average of26 to 28 days (NGPC 1995). Female piping plovers have been known <br />to renest up to five times in one season if their nests are destroyed. The average life span of a <br />piping plover is thought to be about 3.5 years, but some individuals have lived up to 14 years <br />(NGPC 1995). <br /> <br />If a predator approaches a nest or chick, the adult piping plovers will frequently try to lead the <br />predator away by performing the "broken wing" act. Most piping plovers in Nebraska nest in or <br />near least tern nesting colonies and average nesting colonies in the state have 5 to 10 pairs of <br />least terns and I to 3 pairs of piping plovers (NGPC 1995). This association is thought to be <br />beneficial to piping plovers because the terns aggressively defend the colony area by mobbing <br />the inOUder until it is chased away. <br /> <br />Newly hatched chicks are precocial and within a few hours after hatching, the chicks leave the <br />nest and are capable of running, feeding, and even swimming if necessary. Young plover chicks <br />require a great deal of energy to grow and will forage almost constantly unless weather, fatigue, <br />or the presence of a predator prohibits this activity. The chicks are capable of making short <br />flights at about 20 to 25 days of age and are normally totally fledged by 28 days of age. <br /> <br />Piping plovers forage for invertebrates at the substrate surface in open, wet, sandy areas along <br />river systems and alkali v..ctlw.~d shorelines. In riverine locatio:!ls, foraging areas include the <br />nesting area itself as well as adjacent sandbar flats. Com and Armbruster (1993) identified <br />several patterns of invertebrate distribution and abundance of significance to piping plover <br />foraging and breeding success. Their research emphasizes the importance of river charmel <br />habitat for foraging. Although the food base is similar taxonomically between sandbars and spoil <br />piles, invertebrate catch rates and densities are higher on river charmel sites. Invertebrates are <br />distributed more or less uniformly across riverine foraging habitat but decline with increasing <br />distance from water's edge at sand pit locations. Invertebrate catch rates increased more <br />dramatically over the course of the summer on river channel sites than on aggregate mining sites. <br />These patterns of invertebrate occurrence translated into greater foraging activity on river <br />charmel sites even though only a small fraction of piping plovers nest on the river due to a lack of <br />suitable nesting sites. <br /> <br />The abiotic characteristic that most likely explains the differences in invertebrate catch rates <br />between the river charmel and spoil pile sites is substrate moisture. The dominant invertebrate <br />taxa collected from both sites were shore-inhabiting and semi-aquatic species associated with <br />I/IIS tlnIilIer ~ CIJde <br />5-4 68F0D972!l6OO1<1.doc 6J2J'999(9,S2AM)/URSGWCFS12 FedenIIItInIt:a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.