My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00190
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:34:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/2/1999
Author
URS Greiner Woodward
Title
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley - Delivery Order Number 86
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SEellONFOUR <br /> <br />least Tern <br /> <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />'1 <br />I <br />J <br />,1 <br />,I <br />IJ <br />,I <br />~ <br /> <br />4, 1989, hosting a maximum often juveniles and eight adults on July 18. A maximum of25 <br />least terns (twelve juveniles, thirteen adults) was observed on July 21, 1989, on Shoemaker <br />Island, south of AIda, Nebraska. This site hosted least terns from July 11 to August 10, 1989. <br />Least terns traveled between 4 to 57 miles from where they nested to reach a congregation site <br />(FWS 1997). <br /> <br />Reproduction Success Factors <br /> <br />Nest Fates. Predation and flooding accounted for 74 percent (37 percent each) of nest failure on <br />river habitat. Predation was the greatest cause of nest failure on sand pits followed by human <br />disturbance and weather. Only 3 percent of the sand pit nests were lost to flooding compared to <br />37 percent of the river nests. However, human disturbance and abandonment accounted for 27 <br />percent of sand pit nests that failed and only 17 percent of the failed river nests (it should be <br />noted that some of the losses attributed to abandonment may have been due to predators killing <br />adults; therefore, this category is somewhat subjective). Weather took a larger toll on sand pit <br />nests as well because the uniform substrate on the spoil piles was more susceptible to wind and <br />water erosion than the riverine substrates. Overall, predation was the major cause of nest <br />mortality. Dogs or coyotes (Canis latrans) were suspected in 38 cases (78 percent); skunks <br />(Mephitis spp.) in three cases (6 percent); raccoon (Procyon lotor), great-horned owl (Bubo <br />virginianus), and American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) in two cases (4 percent) each; great <br />blue heron (Ardea herodias) and snake in one case (2 percent) each. Other potential predators <br />included mink (Mustela vison), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), black-billed magpie (Pica <br />pica), bullsnake (Pituophis melanoleucus sayi), and garter snake (Thamnophis spp.) (FWS 1997). <br /> <br />Chick and Adult Mortality. The only available information includes both least tern and piping <br />plover mortality. Circumstantial evidence suggested causes of mortality on 21 occasions <br />involving 38 birds (33 least terns and 5 piping plovers). About 53 percent of the adult deaths <br />were due to predation, 33 percent to weather, and 13 percent to humans. Forty-three percent of <br />the chicks deaths were weather related, 39 percent by vehicles, and 17 percent by predators <br />(FWS 1997). <br /> <br />Nest Success and Flow Relationships. In 5 of the 7 years from 1985 through 1991, flooding <br />inundated least tern eggs and/or chicks. The worst nest losses occurred in 1988 when 79 percent <br />of the least tern nests were flooded. That summer was characterized by multiple spikes in the <br />hydrograph. The frequency and timing of these summer spikes determined the magnitude of nest <br />and chick loss. For example, in 1987, only nests were flooded because the timing did not allow <br />for hatching; while in 1990, only chicks were flooded because the spike occurred well after <br />hatching (FWS 1997). <br /> <br />Flooding of nests is a natural phenomenon which least terns are adapted to deal with through <br />renesting and other reproductive strategies (Sidle et aI. 1992; Kirsch and Sidle 1999). However, <br />Lingle (1993) observed that releases from the 1-2 Return near Lexington, Nebraska coupled with <br />local thundershowers exacerbate the flooding problem. For example, during the 44-day period <br />from June 29 to August 11, 1990, the J-2 Return flow was zero cfs despite the fact that over <br />2,100 cfs was being diverted into the Tri-County Canal. The flow at Grand Island, Nebraska <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />4-8 68f;OD97286lX1Ir1.aoc 6r.V1999(9.52AM)lURSG\NCFS1'2 <br /> <br />IIBS SIelBe1 ~ CIJrIe <br />fedetaI SlIntl:es <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.