Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />f <br />J <br />t <br />t <br />1/ <br />~ <br />I <br />W <br />l <br />~ <br />\ <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />"'." ~ ~ ~l r <br />,,:1' J:) <br />t~ '.... ... <br /> <br />SECTIO.FOUR <br /> <br />leastTem <br /> <br />therefore, productivity varies greatly from year to year. Populations could be maintained if <br />fledging success is high periodically (Mertz 1971; Caswell 1982). <br /> <br />4.4.2 Importance of the Platte River <br /> <br />Considerable population data has been collected on least terns along the central Platte River. <br />Habitat utilized in the central Platte River ecosystem includes the riverine habitat associated with <br />the river sand and gravel spoils areas associated with past and ongoing sand and gravel dredging <br />operations. <br /> <br />River Channel Habitat Features <br /> <br />Location and total number of adult least terns on sandbars on the central Plane River during the <br />II-year period (1988 through 1998) are provided in Table 4-2. Mapped locations of riverine and <br />sand pit nesting areas within the central Platte River are provided in Appendix A. <br /> <br />Field research in 1988 on least terns along the Platte River censused and examined least tern <br />riverine habitat using ground transects and aerial videography (Ziewitz et aI. 1992). During <br />1988, a total of 222 least tern nests at 30 sites was located on the Plane River. Most nesting <br />occurred on the lower Platte River. Least tern nest initiation dates ranged from May 19 to June <br />23. The median nest initiation dates for least terns was June 7. They nested earlier on the lower <br />Platte River than on the central Platte River. <br /> <br />In the aerial videography of the central Platte River, moderately vegetated sandbars and sandbars <br />only slightly exposed above water (not suitable nesting habitat) were common (ZiewitZ et al. <br />1992). Areas that could clearly be interpreted as potentially suitable nesting substrate were rare. <br />River discharge at Grand Island ranged from 25 to 2,570 cfs on the eight sampling dates of aerial <br />videography. With one exception, sandbar areas greater than 2 acres were measured only on the <br />two lowest flow dates (June 15 and 24). The mean sandbar area of nest sites was 1.2 acres for <br />the eight dates examined. Ibis was significantly greater than the mean of 0.6 acre for systematic <br />sample sites. The mean channel width of nest sites was 975 feet, significantly greater than the <br />mean of 660 feet for the systematic sample sites. Most nests (90.3 percent) had less than 50 <br />percent vegetative cover in the surrounding 3-foot square area, and all had average vegetation <br />heights less than 2 feet (Ziewitz et aI. 1992). <br /> <br />On the central Platte River, the mean elevation above the 400 cfs stage at nest sites ranged from <br />0.2 to 2.0 feet, with a mean of 1.0 foot. The mean elevation at the systematic sample of sites <br />ranged from 0.1 to 1.8 feet, with a mean of 0.4 foot. These means were not significantly <br />different. The maximum elevation above the 400 cfs stage at nest sites ranged from 0.4 to 4.4 <br />feet, with a mean of 2.7 feet. The maximum elevation at the systematic sample of sites ranged <br />from 0.3 to 3.7 feet, with a mean of 1.4 feet. These means were not significantly different <br />(Ziewitz et aI. 1992). <br /> <br />In summary, comparisons of sandbar area, channel width, mean elevation, and maximum <br />elevation of nest sites versus systematic sample sites in the Platte River suggest that least terns <br />use wide channels with a large area of dry, sparsely vegetated sand. By these two measures <br />alone, habitat availability was considerably greater on the lower Platte River than on the central <br /> <br />fIllS GnliDer ~ant "'* <br />FetIetII Senfl:es <br /> <br />56F0097286OOh1.ox. 6I'2l"~.9".'52. NA)I\)'R.SGV\'tfS/2 4-5 <br />