Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />a'J~g39 <br /> <br />SECTIONTHREE <br /> <br />Whooping Crane <br /> <br />reported predation of sandhill cranes by coyotes. Bobcats prey on young whooping cranes in <br />Florida and Texas. <br /> <br />Contagious diseases such as avian tuberculosis and avian cholera are threats to whooping cranes <br />(Lewis 1991; FWS 1981). Large concentrations of migrating waterfowl and sandhill cranes (i.e., <br />overcrowding due to habitat loss) likely contribute to the spread of both cholera and tuberculosis. <br />Actions which increase the potential for whooping cranes becoming infected with these diseases <br />represent a threat to the species. <br /> <br />Avian cholera is a chronic problem in palustrine wetlands of south-central Nebraska's Rainwater <br />Basin area, often causing die-offs oflarge numbers of waterfowl. Avian cholera has been <br />confirmed in sandhill cranes in three separate instances on the Platte River, though no population <br />outbreaks along the Platte River have occurred. It is known that whooping cranes also are <br />susceptible to avian cholera (FWS 1981); in January 1985, avian cholera was confirmed in a <br />whooping crane from the Rocky Mountain population (Doughty 1989). The threat of <br />transmission of avian cholera to the Platte River may be reduced if flows sufficient to provide a <br />high rate of flushing and dilution are maintained (FWS 1981). <br /> <br />Avian tuberculosis has been diagnosed in 7 of 18 (39 percent) wild whooping cranes necropsied <br />at the National Wildlife Health Research Center during the period of 1982-1990 (Lewis 1991). <br />One bird from the Aransas-Wood Buffalo population was confirmed to have tuberculosis, and <br />another from that population was a suspect case. Avian tuberculosis likely exists in small <br />numbers of migratory birds and may be transmitted through direct contact with infected birds <br />(FWS I 987a). <br /> <br />Oil spills and toxic contaminants are a potential hazard to the wintering area, due to intercoastal <br />navigation. Three spills by nearby navigation traffic occurred in 1995 alone (Lewis 1996) even <br />though no incident directly affecting whooping cranes or their wintering habitats has yet <br />occurred. <br /> <br />Other types of cataStrophic events that contribute to the species endangerment are exemplified by <br />at least one discrete event of direct mortality. A severe storm that struck the Louisiana coast in <br />August 1940 led to the eJCtinction of the only known nonmigratory flock of whooping cranes. <br />Events that could have severe and possibly catastrophic affects on the species are drought on the <br />nesting area; contagious disease within the flock; storms such as hurricanes, tornadoes, or <br />blizzards; or contaminant spills in essential habitats vital to the species. This vulnerability to <br />cataStrophic events has prompted the FWS to undertake experimental efforts to establish <br />additional populations. <br /> <br />3.3 BIOLOGY <br /> <br />3.3.1 Life History <br /> <br />Whooping cranes have a maximum longevity of22 to 24 years in the wild, but 35 to 40 years in <br />captivity (FWS 1994). The average age offJrst egg production is slightly over 4 years. They <br />mate for life, but will remate following the death of their mate. <br /> <br />_ BnIiDer WlllIdI..1f t:IyrIe <br />feIIv.II SI.. oIUll <br /> <br />68FOD9T286OO1r1.doC 6I2J1999(9:52AM)/URSGWcFS/2 3-3 <br />