Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />If\ -"\ l', ('\., I <br />u:....,....' .... . 't <br /> <br />SECTIGNTWO <br /> <br />Environmental Selling <br /> <br />growth. Currier (1995) did not remeasure sites after the 1995 flood but estimated that IS to 25 <br />percent of advanced growth was removed by that flood. <br /> <br />In a more recent analysis, Currier (1996) examined charmel changes in a 45-mile reach between <br />the J-2 Return and Shelton. In addition to expanding the study area of his previous analysis <br />(Currier 1995), Currier also examined charmel changes over a longer period (1984 to 1995) and <br />specifically examined whooping crane habitat within the designated critical habitat reach. <br />Currier (1996) docwnented an 18.7 percent decline in channel area in the 1984 to 1995 period. <br /> <br />The BOR is currently conducting a study of charmel changes and charmel equilibrium along the <br />Central Platte River. More than 40 cross sections were resurveyed in the fall of 1998, and the <br />data are currently being analyzed. <br /> <br />River reaches with greater vegetative encroachment are no longer suitable for either sandhill <br />crane or whooping crane habitat. Small segments of river that retain wide charmels, and <br />segments that ruive been mechanically cleared and maintained free of vegetation by the National <br />Audubon Society and the Trust, are the primary suitable whooping crane habitat remaining on <br />the Platte River (FWS 1997) <br /> <br />Early accounts to pre-settlement vegetation suggest that extensive bands of marshes and <br />meadows may have extended along the river's edge (Currier et al. 1985). In 1982, the estimated <br />area of wet meadow had declined to approximately 59 percent of the acreage estimated for 1938. <br />Over the same period, riparian forest and cropland increased by at least 44 to 48 percent (Sidle et <br />al. 1989). Loss of wet meadow habitats is attributed to reduced springtime river flows and <br />ditching for groundwater and surface water drainage. Williams (1978) and Eschner et al. (1983) <br />have described the reduction in spring peak flows that has occurred over the past century. <br /> <br />2.4 HYDROLOGIC BASELINE <br /> <br />Analysis being developed by BOR. <br /> <br />2.5 WATER QUALITY <br /> <br />Analysis being developed by BOR. <br /> <br />2.6 SEDIMENT <br /> <br />Analysis being developed by BOR. <br /> <br />2.7 BOTTOMLAND GRASSLANDS (WET MEADOWS) <br /> <br />2.7.1 Definition <br /> <br />In the Platte Valley, the term wet meadow has been commonly used to identify areas of <br />bottomland grasslands that have interspersed wetland channels and swales that are often flooded <br />during the early part of the growing season. These areas may occupy 10 to 50 percent of the area <br />(Currier 1998). According to Currier (1997), "mesic or wet prairies, sedge meadows, emergent <br /> <br />IIISBnlIIIer ~t:I1* <br />1efIeIaISt..fJ r sa'OD972ll6OO/>"1.aoc 6/2I'999(~52AM)lURSGWC'S12 2-7 <br />