My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00178
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/2/2002
Title
Re-Operation of Navajo Dam-Department of Water Resources Water Management Branch Comments on Navajo Reservoir Operations EIS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COMMENTS ON THE DEIS NAVAJO RESERVOIR OPERATIONS <br />Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources & Department of Justice <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />accurate methodology may demonstrate that the consumptive uses are <br />1 owe r , <br /> <br />Comment 8, Page 111-15, No Action Alternative, First Paragraph <br /> <br />The DEIS states that under the No Action Alternative, the <br />average reservoir elevations would generally be higher, As <br />presented. these higher reservoir elevations may be interpreted as <br />benefits of the No Action Alternatives; however, the primary reason <br />that reservoir levels are higher is the assumption that NIIP and <br />r, other authori zed water demands do not occur, The DEIS should <br />I.' distinguish between the impacts attributable to the flow <br />1\: recommendations as described under the Preferred Alternative. and <br />V. the impacts associ ated with the completion of NIIP and other <br />, authorized purposes, <br /> <br />Comment 9, Page II1-15, Last Paragraph & Page 1II-17, 5ee/5eee <br />Alternative, First Paragraph 6 <br /> <br />The DEIS should elaborate on the risks to non-Indian water <br />rights and non-Indian water users under the No Action and the <br />~5BB/5BBB Alternatives, Costly litigation is one. almost certain <br />~ consequence, Uncertainty and disruption in existing water <br />I'deliveries are also possible, These disruptions have economic <br />~ consequences that should be described, <br /> <br />Comment 1e, Page II1-22, Table II1-] <br /> <br />Table 111-3 purports to include the San Juan River Basin water <br />uses, However, the existing Navajo Nation uses listed in this <br />table exclude the current municipal water use in the Shiprock area, <br />It also excludes the Navajo tributary irrigation. Navajo <br />evaporation from stock ponds and reservoirs. and groundwater used <br />for livestock and municipal purposes, Even if these uses are not <br />precisely quantified in the basin, they do occur and their omission <br />from Table 111-3 should be included in a footnote, <br /> <br />Comment 11, Page 111-25, First Paragraph <br /> <br />The DEIS states that it is not currently economically <br />.practicable. to construct pipelines and pump water to many <br />irrigation tracts or projects scattered throughout the Navajo <br />Indian Reservation, This phrase should be rewritten without the <br />word .practicable," That word may be construed to have legal <br />implications in future irrigation claims asserted for the Navajo <br />Nation, Although it may be true that there are many irrigation <br />tracts that cannot be economically irrigated directly from the San <br />Juan River. many irrigation tracts may be economically irrigated, <br />Furthermore. many of the San Juan River Basin tributary irrigation <br /> <br />001J~S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.