My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00178
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:34:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/2/2002
Title
Re-Operation of Navajo Dam-Department of Water Resources Water Management Branch Comments on Navajo Reservoir Operations EIS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COMMENTS ON THE DEIS NAVAJO RESERVOIR OPERATIONS <br />Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources & Department of Justice <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />DEIs overstates various benefits that could accrue under the No <br />Action Alternative. <br /> <br />Comment 48. I1I-1S8. FLOOD CUN/NOL. Impacts Analysis, No Ad lOll <br />Alternative; III-16e. NAVAJO DAI1 OPERATIONS AND I1AIN TENANCE. <br />Impacts Analysis. No Action Alternative; 111-162. SAFETY OF DAI1S <br />Impacts Analysis. No Action Alternative; ETC. <br /> <br />Comment 47 is equally applicable to the analysis of impacts on <br />all other components of described as the Affected Environment in <br />Chapter IlL <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> <br />Comment 49. IV-I. Environmental Commitments and l1itigation <br />l1easures, Reservoir Operations <br /> <br />The DEIs recognizes that there is some flexibility in <br />reservoir releases. due largely to the fact that NIIP is not fully <br />developed. There is the possibility that this water could be used <br />to mitigate some of the impacts resulting from reservoir operations <br />cons is tent with the P refer red A 1 te rnat i ve. Howeve r, two poi nt s <br />should be emphasi zed. Fi rst. the Navajo Nation should have the <br />ultimate say in how undeveloped Navajo water is to be utilized. <br />And second, mitigation is not legally required: therefore, no <br />entity may require Reclamation to release unused Navajo water as a <br />mitigation measure. Based on the information available at this <br />time. the Preferred Alternative is the only alternative that is <br />legally sustainable, with or without mitigation. <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />The DEIs provides an overly conservative analysis of dam <br />operations. The benefits from the Preferred Alternative are <br />consistently undervalued. while costs of the adverse impacts <br />associated from that Alternative are consistently overstated. <br />Nevertheless. the DEIs reaches the only conclusion that is <br />technically, legally, and environmentally defensible - that Navajo <br />Dam must be operated consistent with the Flow Recommendations <br />developed to enhance the habitat for the endangered fish in the San <br />Juan River. Thus. the Preferred Alternative is the only <br />alternative that can pass legal muster under the Endangered Species <br />Act and the Nation Environmental Policy Act. <br /> <br />OOIJGfJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.