My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00170
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:33:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.310.40
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Water Conservation District - Meeti
State
CO
Basin
Western Slope
Date
5/3/1988
Author
CRWCD
Title
1937 - 1987 50th Colorado River Water Conservation District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />by Colorado-Ute Electric Association of Montrose interested in <br />purchasing the hydro. The sale of power would have paid some up <br />front costs and construction. The license application, before the <br />FERC for a number of years. was eventually denied. In the in- <br />terim, Colorado-Ute withdrew from the project basing their deci- <br />sion on economic conditions and a lack of a ready market for the <br />peaking power, a major disappointment. <br />Coming up with alternatives to the original hydro facility and <br />filing again with the FERC for a license is possihile. Diligence is <br />being maintained on valuable senior water rights owned by the <br />River District to be available when needed, and local citizen sup- <br />port remains high. <br />The District formed its first sub-district in the western one- <br />third of Rio Blanco County in the 70's. Water Users Association <br />No.1, as a vehicle to build a project. The decree forming a sub- <br />district in the Colorado River Water Conservation District was <br />approved by the District Court in Meeker in 1977. In 1980, a <br />special bond election was held and voters of the subdistrict con- <br />sented to indebt themselves by $13 million in general obligation <br />bonds by a margin of 10 to 1; construction began in 1982 on the <br />13.800 acre-foot reservoir with no state or federal funds involved; <br />and in 1984, dedication ceremonies were conducted for Taylor <br />Draw Dam and Kenney Reservoir on the White River (Rangely <br />Project). The town of Rangely now has a dependable water supp- <br />ly. hydro !lIay be added to the dam in the future, and the reser- <br />voir means recreational opportunities not available before to <br />visitors and people of the area. <br />The Colorado River District has undergone changes in its fifty <br />years of existence. In its early and middle years, emphasis was on <br />fighting transmountain diversions. filing on water rights, <br />cooperating with others in resolving water issues and litigation. <br />Today. the District is moving toward actually applying water to <br />beneficial use by construction and project financing along with its <br />other responsibilities. The River District will continue its <br />historical practice of filing on good reservoir sites, continue to ag- <br />gressively protect its decrees and to cooperate with others. This <br />is based on the premise that while yesterday's filings provide to- <br />day's water supply, today's filings will serve as the foundation for <br />tomorrow's water supply. <br /> <br />Protection, conservation and development of Western Col- <br />orado water always has and will continue to require a wide range <br />of legal activities. There have been times when litigation filed by <br />others in state and federal courts could have ultimately had an ef.' <br />feet on the cost of water and even reduced supplies in Western" <br />Colorado. ,.:-- <br />The River District has fought such cases a number of times hi-' <br />the past and will continue to do so. Local conservancy districts <br />and communities generally lack expertise in water matters and <br />simply cannot afford to enter litigation. That is when the District <br />can and does respond to the needs of West Slope water users. <br /> <br />THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS <br /> <br />mow will history treat the next half century of the Colorado <br />River District? In part, the answer is in the words of Frank <br />Delaney from remarks made at that public meeting in 1937 called <br />by the Western Colorado Protective Association to chart a future <br />course of action. He said: "When those of us who are here actively <br />participating are gone. there will still be problems to solve." <br />Later when he retired, after serving nearly two decades as <br />General Counsel, Delaney was quoted as saying: "I hope my work <br />has been of some lasting benefit to the District, its inhabitants. <br />and the people of Western Colorado in general. I realize. <br />however, that what we have done or failed to do can only be ap- <br />praised with accuracy twenty-five years or maybe fifty years <br />from now." <br />A. Allen Brown, an insightful leader and President, was a man <br />who served the River District effectively in pioneering the <br />development of water resources in Western Colorado. Upon his <br />retirement in 1983. a former Governor of the State of Colorado <br />said of him: "When history is written about the people who made <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.