My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00170
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00170
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:33:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.310.40
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Water Conservation District - Meeti
State
CO
Basin
Western Slope
Date
5/3/1988
Author
CRWCD
Title
1937 - 1987 50th Colorado River Water Conservation District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Traditionally, the River District has kept an eye on the Col- the Rifle/Silt area. Both projects have been built although World <br />orado House and Senate. So it was in the early days that the War II delayed them for more than a decade. <br />board became troubled by certain bills being introduced suppor- <br />ting the formation of Conservancy Districts. Not that they were <br />opposed to such districts but, according to Delaney. bills seemed <br />to be written so as to be of a greater benefit to Eastern Colorado <br />than the West Slope. <br />Out of this concern came one of the early accomplishments of TIME FOR CHANGE <br />the River District, influencing acceptance of an ammendment to <br />the Conservancy District Act. The ammendment implemented <br />the Delaney principle of Senate Document 80, compensatory n : <br />storage reservoirs on the West Slope for any transmountainUhe Great Depression came to an end as the nation shifted <br />diversion by a conservancy district. gears to a war economy. International affairs. the war to end all <br />The District has actively participated in the formation of Con- wars, WWII, had an increasing effect on the Colorado River <br />servancy Districts by working with local groups and individuals District for the next five years. District programs such as in- <br />interested in sponsoring a water storage project. Upon comple- vestigations into water projects anticipating post-war develop- <br />tion of a project decrees have been signed over to a Conservancy ment did continue. but on a limited basis. Manpower to ac- <br />District responsible for the financing, operation and maintenance complish survey plans was hard to come by due to the heavy draft <br />of the dam and reservoir. Many reservoirs in place and serving of men into the armed forces. Investigations and permit work on <br />Western Colorado today were built on River District decrees several projects was delayed because of a shortage of engineers. <br />maintained for just such a purpose. In the nation's capitol, high priority was being given to a water <br />An October 1956 resolution adopted by the Board of Directors treaty with Mexico by the war command. The Colorado River had <br />clearly states River District responsibilities as: filing upon and been a source of disagreement between the United States and old <br />reserving, by conditional decree. water for future development Mexico for years. Mexico complained its rights to use of the river <br />within the District, and providing that the water rights so were being ignored by the U.S. Then, in 1945 during the war. the <br />established would be assigned, without cost. to any suitable enti- United States entered into a treaty with old Mexico calling for <br />ty proposing to construct or contract to obligate themselves for delivery of 1.5 million acre-feet of Colorado River water per year <br />such development, provided that no transfer would be made of to Mexico. <br />such water rights except for beneficial uses within the boun- The quid pro quo not specifically mentioned in the water treaty <br />daries of the District. was that the United States could send its forces to Mexico to <br />By statute, the Colorado River District cannot go into debt. but repel the anticipated invasion of southern California by way of <br />it is through the financing capability of subdistricts or conservan- the unprotected Mexican Baja California Peninsula. <br />cy districts in cooperation with the River District that the California fought against ratification, but other basin states, <br />District had been able to put water to beneficial use fulfilling its lead by Colorado, campaigned for the treaty. The River District <br />statuatory responsibility. board endorsed the actions of the state, and further, Frank Mer- <br />Two early examples of working with the locals to build a pro- rill, secretary-engineer for the District, devoted almost full time <br />ject ...oi)ld be: creation of the North Fork Water Conservancy to help secure ratification. Thus, a maximum effort by the state <br />District'iII 1941 to sponsor construction of the Paonia Project, and and by the River District to accomplish a task that seemed urgent <br />the formll1ion of a conservancy district to build the Silt Project in at the time. <br />.'~ 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.