My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00164
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:02 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:33:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
7/11/1961
Author
Mr Aspinall
Title
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. .. ," <br />",a,. "', <br />\itV ... ~1 <br /> <br />FRYlNGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, .COLORADO. <br /> <br />I <br />J <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />Oll the basis of test.imony submit.ted to the" committee in prior <br />Congresses, this dcr-rec in iwd of itseH makes the wut.er supply UIl- I <br />certllin. The fiurCtl\1 of Reelll11ultion gUYC test.imony thilt thoy only \ :11 <br />had reeards over fl ;34-yelll" period. To be wOl'kn.hlc, the project re- <br />quired llll of the wat.ers collcetcd from the colll~ct,ioll syst.em on t.he <br />Fryingpiul fLnd the Aspl1.n Reservoir on Hunter Creck to Dutko the <br />neecssftry diversions. The consent <-leereo deurly shows that the <br />nc(,p.ss:1I')' Wall'l" for this project is therefore ulll1sa'illlble,. <br />10. The costs disclosed by t,bis bill are not all thnt would be neces- <br />sary bceause the hill uut.horizes a st.udy of 11 reservoir to be built at <br />a lllter date on Cnstlc Creek. <br />For the foregoing- rensons, as well as many others reflected in the <br />material which WitS present.ed to the committee, t.his legislation, whic-h <br />involves an expenditure of $169,905,000 together wit.h an tiduitionn.l <br />$64 million if covered conduits nre found to be required, should not <br />be approved unt,il t,here is a real economic justification which to duff' <br />has not been presented. ' <br />JOHN P. SAYLOR. <br />JOHN KYL. <br />J. ERNES'f "rHARTON. <br />ODIN LANGEN. <br />CRAW HOSMER. <br />JAMES A, HALEY. <br />D. S. SAUND. <br /> <br />:) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.