Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ cropland and some 44 million acres of nonfederal forest and rangeland within <br />~ the United States' portion of the Basin. <br />~ <br /> <br />Salinity control in the Colorado River Basin is addressed in the <br />Colorado River, Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-320~ The <br />Act has two major components. one is to maintain the quality standard <br />agreed to,on August 30, 1973, in Minute 242 of International Boundary and <br />Water Commission for water delivered to Mexico under the Mexican Water Treaty <br />of 1944. This is covered in Title I of the Act which includes a large desalt- <br />ing plant to treat drainage return flows from the Well ton-Mohawk Irrigation <br />and Drainage District near Yuma, Arizona. <br /> <br />The second component, covered in Title II of the Act, deals with the salinity <br />concentration in the River above Imperial Dam and the controls necessary to <br />meet U.S. water quality standards established by the seven basin States and <br />EPA. <br /> <br />USDI is assigned leadership responsibilities which has been delegated to the <br />USBR of that Department. USDA and the EPA are named as cooperating agencies <br />and USDA's involvement is documented in a MOU with Interior. <br /> <br />The Salinity Problem <br /> <br />The salinity ,of the w~r delivered to Mexico increased from an'annual <br />average of about 800 mg/l to nearly 1,500 mg/l in 1962. This was partially <br />attributed to the highly saline drainage return flows from the Wellton-Mohawk <br />area which empties into the Colorado River below Imperial Dam. Title I of <br />the Act deals with this problem. <br /> <br />The total salt load in the river entering Lake Mead above Boover Dam is <br />estimated to average 10 million tons per year. To meet the salinity control <br />objective of Title II, it is necessary to remove some 2.8 million tons per <br />year of this salt load. The present average annual salinity concentration of <br />the river varies from about 50 mg/l in the headwaters to about 820 mg/l at <br />Imperial Dam. The USDI projects a future salinity level of 1,141 mg/l at <br />Imperial Dam for the year 2000 as additional upstream development takes <br />place, assuming no corrective action. The long-term'average annual <br />salinity concentration at Imperial Dam is 875 mg/l under current devel- <br />opment conditions. Each mg/l increase in salinity concentration causes <br />approximately $469,000 per year (first quarter 1981 dollars) in economic <br />damages to downstream agricultural, municipal, and industrial water users <br />within the U.S. The control of salinity in the river at the historic level, <br />while the States continue to develop compact apportions of water supply, is <br />required by an agreement made between the seven Basin States and EPA for <br />implementation of Public Law 92-500, the Clean Water Act. <br /> <br />Average onfarm irrigation and distribution system efficiencies, especially in <br />the Upper Basin, are generally low. Low irrigation efficiencies generally <br />indicate high surface runoff and/or overirrigation. Overirrigation can <br />result in excessive deep percolation which leaches excess salts from the <br />soil into the river. This greatly contributes to the salinity problem. <br /> <br />4 <br />