Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />governors appointed special drought committees to <br />study the situation in their state and recommend or <br />implement a remedial program. Both state and federal <br />governments began special programs of financial. <br />assistance to individuals suffering economic hardship <br />because of drought eonditions and to provIde <br />emergency water supply where needed. The gover- <br />nors. of the western states established a Drought <br />Action Task Force to coordinate their efforts and <br />provided It technical staff support through a <br />temporary expansion in the staff of the Western <br />States Water Council in Salt Lake City. Every two <br />weeks the Council published an "Update"on western <br />drought conditions that contained a summary of <br />current and forecast precipitation and runoff condi- <br />tions, a description of actions being taken by the <br />several states to deal with the drought problem, and a <br />description of reeent federal drought assistance <br />activity, The Institute for Policy Research in the <br />Western Governors' Policy Office prepared and <br />distributed a manual, "Directory of Federal. Drought <br />Assistance 1977," that inventoried drol!ght problems, <br />identified federal programs and pending legisu.tion <br />applicable to each problem, and provided information <br />that drought-impacted parties could Ull!l to take <br />advantage of the programs. The. I.nstitute also <br />undertook studies to help states strengthen their <br />capacity to help water users through future droughts <br />and to identify and prioritize drought-related researeh <br />needs. <br /> <br />The government response to the drought situa- <br />tion concentrated on 1) financial assistance to alleviate <br />the economic impact of reduced water supply, 2) <br />financial aid to supplement available water supply <br />(e.g., constructing new wells), and 3) collection and <br />dissemination of information on how water ull!lrs could <br />better manage avalisble supplies during drought <br />periods. The first response seemed to be the most <br />popular, but the latter two did more. for wise water <br />use. <br /> <br />INFORMATION DISSEMINATED <br /> <br />Drought conditions invariably generate public <br />concern over hardships experienced and worries that <br />the situation will worsen. The media respond with <br />stories that describe the drought and its effects snd <br />with interviews seeking expert opinion on future <br />expectations. Current drought information helps <br />people do a better job of planning water-using <br />activities and helps government focus on responsive <br />water use control and public assistance programs, As <br />people act to accommodate drought conditions and as <br />government implements a drought program, the <br />media begin to describe various water saving <br />innovations to spread good ideas to additional <br />potential users, to describe water use control <br />regulations so that those in the regulated area will <br />know what is expeeted and other jurisdictions will be <br />better informed for. planning regulatory programs, <br />and to publicize the public assistance program so that <br />needy individuals will know wh~t is available and <br />whom to see for particular kinds of help. The media, <br />however, can only disseminate information; they have <br />Umlted resources for developing original information <br /> <br />or sorting the facts out of all that is being said. <br />Obviously, there is a need for expert analysis to make <br />the diatributed information more reliable. <br /> <br />Information relisbillty ia best discussed by <br />classifying the various types of information and <br />considering each type separately. Disseminated <br />information covers: <br /> <br />1. 7'lIe stote of the aVGi/ab/e water IIlIpplll, <br />e.,;,<<"I1 MId fW'OJected. Weather ia always a popular <br />news topic, and drought conditions make it more so. <br />The weather inlormation distributed in drought- <br />prone, arid climates places much greater emphasis on <br />precipitation amounts, cumulative precipitation to- <br />tals, and snowpack conditions than does weather news <br />in more humid cilmates where weather effects on <br />outside activity are the primary concern. The <br />. dependency of the water supply on weather, however, <br />depends on the sources available to a particular water <br />utility or group of water users, Reservoirs hold water <br />for long periods, Springe may be fed by aquifers <br />recharged many years before. Groundwater supplies <br />can be mined during dry periods and recharged during <br />wetter times. Along a stream, downstream water <br />users depend in part on upstream return flows, and <br />. conservation practiees can inerease water use effi- <br />ciency to the. point where those downstream are <br />severely hurt. The network for collecting and <br />distributing weather information is well-developed <br />and quite effective. During the 1976-77 drought, the <br />regular media were supplemented by special series of <br />drought update reports in the several states (often <br />published by the state climatologist) and 01 regional <br />summaries sueh as that published in the "Update of <br />Western Drought Conditions" by the Western States <br />Water Council. The system of aggregating and <br />disseminating weather information proved both <br />relisble and effective, and the only significant <br />difficulties proved to be those of interpretation by the <br />public in communities whose water supply was more <br />resistant to immediate precipitation shortages. The <br />system was more effective in describing average <br />conditions over large areas than in presenting specific <br />looal situations. <br /> <br />2. 7'lIe avail4bilit1l of fW'Ol/'fGmB for finandal <br />aBBiBtallCe. The federal government and governments <br />of most states responded to the drought with a <br />number of programs for providing financial assistance <br />to farmers, ranchers, and affected small businesses; <br />helping communities find supplemental water; regula- <br />ting grazing and recreational use of public lands; etc. <br />The "Directory of Federal Drought Assistance 1977" <br />was used by several ststes to coordinate their <br />activities with those of many active federal agencies. <br />Special interagency drought coordinating committees <br />were formed in most states, and the Western States <br />Water Council and the Western Regional Drought <br />Action Task Force of 21 member states were effective <br />in coordinating activities and exchanging ideas on <br />program effectiveness. <br /> <br />3. [thas and ezp8rUmces on how user. might <br />make aVGi/ab/e water 1IlIpp!ie. go further; how <br />IIlIpplier. might obtain more water, reduce their <br /> <br />2 <br />