Laserfiche WebLink
<br />) <br /> <br />..' <br /> <br />vii. <br /> <br />The Defendants failed to <br /> <br />adequately assess the cost and impact of Narrows on the <br /> <br />human environment of Plaintiffs. <br />viii. The Defendants have based <br />~heir statements of facts and data supporting the feasibility <br />of the Narrows project on outdated and inadequate studies. <br />.ix. The Defendants have <br />failed to conduct adequate long-term studies of the hydrology <br />of the water supply for Narrows. <br />x. The Defendants have not <br />adequately and fairly considered alternatives to Narrows <br />such as: no project; Weld County Reservoir; flood control <br />without storage; off-stream storagej groundwater storage. <br />xi. The Defendants have <br /> <br /> <br />failed to adequately consider the impact of aggradation <br /> <br /> <br />problems at the inlet end of Narrows. <br /> <br /> <br />xii. The Defendants have <br /> <br /> <br />failed to fully and properly investigate the geological <br /> <br /> <br />fOlluation of the r~arrows dam location as well as the safety <br /> <br /> <br />of the structure in light of the Teton Darn experience and <br />the safety and welfare of the citizens of the State of <br />Colorado lying below and in the path of water from a Narrows <br />dam failure. <br /> <br />xiii. <br /> <br />No studies have been made <br /> <br />to adequately assess the flood damage risk to the railroad <br />relocation design resulting from the construction and im- <br />poundment of waters behind the Narrows dam. <br />(6) The Defendants have failed to <br />comply with the mandates of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination <br />Act and the Federal Water Project Recreation Ac~ by not <br />implementing F\'lS recommendations to fully mitigate the <br />wildlife habitat losses. <br />(7) The changes and increased costs as <br />