Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1935' It is evident from the diversion records thllt <br />100% of the flow at the reservoir diverllions oould be "tored <br />until lune 1, and after tlult date Il full supply \1ould be <br /> <br />needed et tile gage. <br /> <br />1936, Reoords of flow at Mancos, end diversions <br /> <br /> <br />below Menees, aho'll that till Yr.;rlO, lOO:r; of the flow et <br /> <br />the reeervoir diveraions could be atored, eftsr lillich, 8 <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />full Bupply would be needed at tn. !Lege. <br /> <br /> <br />By uS\lllling the..t the rell1tion between doily flow et <br /> <br /> <br />the Mencoe gage and at the three points of diversion 1& the <br /> <br /> <br />same es tho relation between the annlllll floll et theBe jlOinte <br /> <br />shown in tabl.e 10, the storable now at each of the diver- <br /> <br />sions weB computed in the follow1nij MaDnl!lr, During the ir- <br /> <br />rogation seeeon, the storable flaY for the Jackson Gulch <br />Reeervo1.X- site wes telten as 52:J; of the flow at the gl\ge, <br />except on dayo dur1ng which the flow at the gage less 52% <br />Wl\ll inlluff1cient to supply the irrigation demnnd at the <br /> <br />gege. On such deYII, the storable flow 1I811 takell Il~ the <br /> <br /> <br />flow in eXC&SfJ of the demend. l:'or the re;neinder of the <br /> <br />year, 100% of the now at. the diversion or 52:J; of the flow <br /> <br /> <br />et the gage during October, 5~ or the flow ht tile divorsion <br /> <br /> <br />or 26% of the flow at the gege from November to ilerch in- <br /> <br /> <br />clusive, Bnd 75% or the flow et the diversion or 39~ of the <br /> <br />flow at the geg0 during AprU we3 conoidered stor"ble. The <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />