Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:1s antioipated t~t this practice will continue to be followed <br /> <br /> <br />in the future ins teed of holdine tile Rpring d1versiona down to <br /> <br />the ideal requirements show in table 7. <br />FrOIl! thE' re<<ord~ of 1'unof! Ilt ;Ap,QCOD !lnd of diver- <br /> <br />s10ns below MancoB, 1t eppeerll toot 1935 and 1936 were yenrG <br /> <br />when ell diversion demnnds wore fully met tor Q con8ider~ble <br /> <br />time, with ra.106 below Mencoe too l1ij;ht to affect f:treom flow <br /> <br />or diversion. From the results of tllase years, it "'es con- <br /> <br />oluded tbet t.he pest net use during the flood Ol!lliSOn Iln early <br /> <br />, . <br />summer wes 100 second-teet for the' 1rr1g~tion of 7,000 acreo. <br />Th1e vas the ind:1c'-lted net 1085 between the Meneos end 'I'o..ElOC <br /> <br />stlltione. >>'Tom tsble 6 1t ",ill be noted tbr.t frOSII dlveJ'oo <br /> <br />sion requiremente reech t. me.x1mwn of .8~ ecre-f"et per "C%'O, <br /> <br /> <br />For en aree of 7,000 ~cres, thi~ 1s equivBl~nt to B continu- <br /> <br />r <br />, <br /> <br />. <br />:1 <br /> <br />, au!! floll of 93 second-feet. <br /> <br />W1th e~t&np1on of the lrr1getcd ~rea to 10,000 or <br />13,000 acres, lends At greeter dlstence5 from the Rtr&Sm <br />will be develo$)ed. 1I'1U.le the .awr conp.::JllJing non-ir,r1t\:llted <br />areas .il1 not be ~,terielly e~rged by these e~tenBionB, <br /> <br />We edV8ntege will likely be fuUy offset by the slower <br /> <br />return flow from t~ more die tent arB~S. <br /> <br />Requirem~nt6 for tne lpr€~r n~ee3 ~re, therefore, <br /> <br /> <br />assumed ~ be in proportion to areae irrigated, or 140 end <br /> <br /> <br />190 second-feet. respectively, for 10,000 and l3,OOO ocres. <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />~ <br />'0 <br />tJ' <br />