My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00081
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00081
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:42 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1995
Title
Press Releases
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ll-Ub-Yl Uj:UbPM FROM GOVERNOR'S OFFICE <br /> <br />TO 2115 <br /> <br />P005 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.......... <br />, <br /> <br />............................... <br /> <br />FROM: SLGO/NEJPf'/SAQE REMINGTON <br /> <br />F'HI>lE NO. : 970 563 4487 <br /> <br />Nev. 0S 1997 11:58AM P2 <br /> <br />Fonner Tribal Council member and SUGO Elder, Guy PiDnecoo.e, Jr. .aid, "We <br />are very pleased that tile letter from the Governor's office and EPA, dearly <br />establish.. that the eUlTeot situatioD il A ehoh:e between two political alternatives." <br />"For SUCO", Plnnecoose said. "it means the NEPA prGttss must sstldY the <br />requirements of the law and that it mllst Involve all affected parties. It meaas the <br />EPA and the Burellll of Rec:lllJIllItlon must fully e:lplo" the Ute Legacy Fund <br />proposal as a legitimate alternative to tbe ALP. Thl. a110 means that they have an <br />oblilation to educate aDd Inform the tribal membership of both alternative <br />proposals." <br /> <br />Ervin Taylor, SUGO Elder and fOrDIer Tribal Council member said, "Decision <br />maken in fedenal agencies wbo are concerned about the Ute people are now free to <br />e:xplol'e and expand on creative ideas for reaolving this problem ina way tlult is fair <br />to tbe Ute people." "We are now rid of the environmental and financial burdens of <br />the irrigation system" Taylor .aid, "aDd the nOD-Indian earpetbaeuers who have <br />been banging on to this project with tbe hope that they will get .ometlUna for <br />nothincl" <br /> <br />"In our viewpoint., and most importantly, with tbe coneJuslon of the Romer <br />SchoettleI' process". said Ray C. Fro.t. "it sets tbe stage that the nut time any <br />deci.iol1 is made about Ute Indian water rights, it will Dot be made in darkness by a <br />few Individuals who are largely influenced by non-Indian InterN"," Fl'ost <br />continued. "This decision is one that the Ute people should be Allowed to DUlke since <br />it fundamentally impacts every aspect of who the Utes are &5 a people and tribe. <br />One of the way. tbis caD be accomplished II to conduct a tribAl education proanm <br />about the alternatives for the Ute people followed by a vote." <br /> <br />Tribal Elder AnnabeJle Eagle said of the Romer/Schoettler procell, "The Ule peCIple <br />were affected by tbe proeess and found our common voice. The RomerlSehoettleJ' <br />process maket it possible for ErA to fully Invatigate and analyze the merits of the <br />Ute Legacy Land and Water Fuad alternative proposal. T.here Is .tUl much work <br />that EPA needs to acc:omplilllllO that an opportnnity !:lls.. for tribal mllmben to <br />vote about whleb alternative is bett for them." <br /> <br />. 30. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.