My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00078
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.100
Description
John Martin Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/4/1970
Author
Duane Helton
Title
A Recreation Pool for John Martin Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />'j <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The Recreation Pool Situation Todav <br /> <br />~ The Game, Fish and Parks Department is still looking for <br />~ <br />~ the lion's share of the water. Shares have been obtained from the <br />~ <br />~j <br />~ Corps of Engineers of three ditch companies, but the amount of <br /> <br />water yielded will be minor. In addition a 5,000 acre-foot storage <br /> <br />right from Setchfield Reservoir7 on Muddy Creek has been transferred <br /> <br />to John Martin, but again, the quantity of water which will actually <br /> <br />be yielded is small and very undependable. At present there are <br /> <br />no promising prospects for the rest of the water, but all are given <br /> <br />consideration. <br /> <br />The water could be purchased annually for the initial <br /> <br />filling and evaporation losses from the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project <br /> <br />or other storage sources. This is not really as desirable as <br /> <br />purchase of a water right because it saddles the State Legislature <br /> <br />to an annual appropriation. <br /> <br />After water rights are secured and the Water Court has <br /> <br />its word, there is one big hurdle to pass. The Arkansas River <br /> <br />Compact Administration must approve the operation procedure. <br /> <br />Kansas may take position that such approval is beyond the authority <br /> <br />of the Administration and the Compact will have to be renegotiated <br /> <br />7Setchfield Dam washed out in the 1965 flood and has not been <br />rebuilt. <br /> <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.