My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00078
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143.100
Description
John Martin Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/4/1970
Author
Duane Helton
Title
A Recreation Pool for John Martin Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />;~- 1 <br /> <br />Water Riqhts Difficult to Secure <br /> <br />~ Even though the Game, Fish and Parks Department has <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ been trying since 1965 to purchase sufficient water rights for <br />c=. <br />C) establishment of the permanent pool, it has been only partially <br /> <br />successful. <br /> <br />~1e estimated average annual evaporation from a 10,000 <br /> <br />acre-foot permanent pool is 3,600 acre-feet6 when calculated <br /> <br />from 20 years of historic storage records. This is only the <br /> <br />evaporation from the additional area caused by the permanent <br /> <br />pool - when the conservation pool is relatively full, the perm- <br /> <br />anent pool exposed area is only a small part of the total area, <br /> <br />but when the conservation pool is dry, the total area exposed to <br /> <br />evaporation is that of the permanent pool. The reservoir evap- <br /> <br />oration rate was assumed to be seven tenths of the measured U. S. <br /> <br />Weather Bureau Class A pan evaporation. <br /> <br />Several factors make purchase of sufficient water rights <br /> <br />difficult. One is that the Arkansas River is over-appropriated. <br /> <br />That is, there are more rights than the normal riverflow so a <br /> <br />certain supply from a water right cannot be depended upon from <br /> <br />year to year unless it is one Of the very best. Another is that <br /> <br />6Study conducted by the staff of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board. <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.