My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00062
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:36 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:30:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.140
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/14/1986
Title
Evaluation and Recommendations Concerning the Authority of the Grand Valley Irrigation Company to Undertake Salinity Control Measures Pursuant to the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,..., <br />., . <br /> <br />C\1 <br />0) <br /> <br />Cl <br /> <br />-', <br />....-. <br /> <br />Company, and the enforcement of such assessments, is both validly <br /> <br />adopted and exercised pursuant to the Company's Bylaws. We make <br /> <br />only one suggestion in this regard, and that is to amend state <br /> <br />statutes to include the power to collect delinquent assessments <br /> <br />directly from a shareholder, in addition to having the right to <br /> <br />cause the forfeiture of stock for nonpayment of assessments. <br /> <br />We also raise, <br /> <br />in the context of revenue-generating <br /> <br />abilities, four concerns regarding the Salinity Control Act which <br /> <br />are not strictly related to the authority of the Company to <br /> <br />assess shares -- yet involve concerns of a fiscal nature which <br /> <br />need ultimately be addressed. <br /> <br />First, section 1592 (b) (2) of the <br /> <br />Salinity Control Act provides reimbursement to non-Federal <br /> <br />entities for operation and maintenance of improved laterals " <br /> <br />.to the extent the costs exceed the expenses that would have <br /> <br />been incurred by them in the thorough and time,ly operation and <br /> <br />maintenance of their canal and lateral systems absent the <br /> <br />construction of a unit, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />The Company does not now own or <br /> <br />operate any lateral canals. <br /> <br />The Company not only has no <br /> <br />historical cost data, but has spent no funds on lateral ditch <br /> <br />operations and maintenance. <br /> <br />The concern is how the Salinity <br /> <br />Control Act will be interpreted in light of these facts, i. e. , <br /> <br />will historic costs be determined from individual lateral users <br /> <br />and thereafter deducted from reimbursement to the Company? If <br /> <br />so, the differential now borne by lateral ditch users will be <br /> <br />transferred to all shareholders <br /> <br />a result .that may not be <br /> <br />acceptable to the Board or shareholders, especially considering <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.