Laserfiche WebLink
<br />grained sediment into the river (Webb and <br />others, 1999). <br />The resuhs of this model indicale that <br />debris flows deliver 0.14--0.30'106 Mglyr <br />of sediment to the main channel. Reach B <br />(Marble Canyon) contributes the greatest <br />amount of debris-flow sediment, which is <br />consistent with both the empirical <br />observations on where debris flows have <br />occurred in the last century as well as the <br />mapped disuibution of probabilities in <br />Grand Canyon (Griffiths and others. <br />1996). Depending upon the assumptions <br />of the debris-flow sediment-yield model, <br />sediment yield by debris flow ranges from <br />4 to 23 percent of lotal sediment yield. <br /> <br />Particle-Size Distributions <br /> <br />The size of the sand fraction is of <br />particular interest for the management and <br />restoration of sand bars in Grand Canyon. <br />Measurements of particle-size distri- <br />butions Slored in stream terraces in various <br />tributaries, as well as suspended sediment <br />samples from Bright Angel Creek and <br />other small tributaries, provide sand <br />contents ranging from I to 99 percent with <br />no discernible pattern. These data were <br />collected from a large discharge range and <br />thus highly variable sand contents would <br />be expected. An average sand content of <br />50 percent of total stream/low sediment <br />yield was used in this study, which <br />compares favorably with average sand <br />content weighted by discharge for the <br />Little Colorado and Paria Rivers (30 and <br />50 percent, respectively). Sand contents of <br />IS, 50, and 7S percent are reported. Sand <br />delivery by streamflow from the Glen and <br />Marble Canyon reaches averages about <br />0.032'106 and 0.305'106 Mglyr, <br />respectively (0.34'106 total). with a <br />combined total of the two reaches ranging <br />from 0.10-0.51'106 Mglyr, depending on <br />the assumed sand content. Sand <br />contributed by tributaries in Glen Canyon <br />is notably coarser (D50=0.24 mm) than <br />sand in other reaches (D50=0. II - 0.20 <br />mm), including the Marble Canyon reach <br />(D50=0.20 mm) (fig. 4). <br />The particle-size distributions of 41 <br />fresh, unaltered deposits of debris flows <br />that occurred between 1965 and 1999 <br />were determined. Pebbles are the most <br />abundant particles at 41 percent by weight. <br />and boulders typically account for about <br />14 percent. The sand content of debris <br /> <br />1 00 10' 1 02 <br /> <br />Drainage Area (km2) <br /> <br />Figure 3. Comparison of methods for calculating streamflow sediment yield. A. Gaging <br />stetion and reservoir data from the Colorado Plateau region (,2 = 0.86). B. Comparison <br />of regional deta regression equation, Renard (1972) equation, end estimetes for 768 <br />ungeged tributaries by the flood.frequency rating-curve method. <br /> <br /> 106 <br /> 10. <br /> 104 <br /> 103 <br /> 102 <br />~ <br />>- <br />- <br />en 10' <br />~ <br />." <br />Qj 100 <br />>= 106 <br />'E <br />Q) <br />E 10. <br />'C <br />Q) <br />C/) 104 <br /> 103 <br /> 102 <br /> 10' <br /> <br />100 <br />10-2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />'" <br /> <br />Small Reservoirs <br />Gaging Stations <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />B <br /> <br />Regional data regression <br />- - - - - Renard (1972) equation <br />o Flood-frequency method <br /> <br />10" <br /> <br />1 03 <br /> <br />1 04 <br /> <br /> <br /> 100 <br />~ <br />Q) 80 'x <br />c: <br />IT: ~ <br />'E <br />Q) 00 <br />~ <br />Q) Reach A (n = 6) <br />0.. - Reach B (n = 71) )( <br />Q) 40 <br />> <br />:; - - - - - Reach C (n = 6) <br />:; . Reach D (n = 3) <br />E 20 <br />::l - Reach F (n = 3) <br />(.) - - )(. <br /> 0 <br /> 2 1 0.5 0.25 0.125 0.063 <br /> Particle Size (mm) <br /> <br />Figure 4. Particle-size distribution of sand delivered by streamflow from ungaged <br />tributaries. Sand Input by streamflow is increasingly finer downstream from the dam. <br /> <br />flows averages about 18.2 percent and <br />ranges from 2 to 47 percent. With debris- <br />fan reworking limited by the operation of <br />Glen Canyon Dam, debris flows transport <br />0.006-0.013'106 Mglyr of sand to the <br />regulated Colorado River, while 0.023- <br /> <br />0.048'106 Mglyr is stored in unreworked <br />pans of debris fans. Depending on the <br />volume model used and the amount of <br />debris-fan reworking, the total sand yield <br />of debris flows in all reaches ranges from <br />0.006-0.054'106 Mglyr. Although debris <br />