My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00051
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:30:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.100.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/1990
Author
CRBSCF
Title
Report on the 1990 Review - Water Quality Standards for Salinity - Colorado River System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER III - WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR SALINITY <br /> <br />Cu Criteria <br />.....:1 <br />00 The Forum developed and agreed upon basinwide water quality <br />N standards for salinity, including numeric criteria and a plan of <br />implementation for salinity control in 1975 (1975 Forum report). <br />The standards were pursuant to federal regulations published in the <br />Federal Register on December 18, 1974. I~ order to provide for <br />sound water quality objectives, based on a basinwide approach, <br />numeric criteria were estab;Lished at three key stations (below <br />Hoover, below Parker, and at Imperial Dams). <br /> <br />The key stations were selected due to their proximity to major <br />diversions in the Lower Basin. The State of Nevada diverts <br />Colorado River main stem water from Lake Mead for municipal and <br />industrial uses in the Las Vegas area. The Metropolitan Water <br />District of Southern California and the Central Arizona Project <br />divert water from Lake Havasu for all uses. The large agricultural <br />areas in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys in California and the <br />Yuma area in Arizona and California are served by diversions at <br />Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The flow-weighted average annual salinity for the year 1972, <br />as determined by Reclamation from daily flow and salinity data <br />collected by the USGS and Reclamation, were selected as the numeric <br />criteria. EPA published regulations in 1974 stating "The flow- <br />weighted average annual salinity in the lower main stem of the <br />Colorado Riv~r ~~stem is to be maintained at or below the average <br />value found during 1972." The states adopted the EPA regulation. <br />There is no inference that 1972 represents a typical or average <br />year. The average daily flow of the river past each of these three <br />measuring points is determined, and the average concentration of <br />salts in the water in milligrams per liter (mg/l) is also <br />determined each day at each of these three measuring points. Each <br />average daily flow is then multiplied by the daily salinity <br />concentratior.s.. ....p.sul ting in a flow/salinity mass I)Jlmbe:r:'. For all <br />365 days of the year, the daily mass numbers are added together, <br />resulting in an annual mass number. The sum of average daily flow <br />(in cfs) of the river past the gage for the entire year is also <br />calculated. The total mass number is then divided by the sum of <br />each average daily flow for the year, and the resulting figure is <br />the flow-wei~hted average annual salinity for the calendar year at <br />that station. <br /> <br />It should be noted that in <br />regulations, 1972 was the year upon <br />The numeric criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />conformance with the 1974 <br />which to base the standards. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />See Appendix B, Forum letter to EPA dated February 26, <br />1990, and EPA Regulation 40 CFR, Part 120. <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.