My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00047
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:31 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:29:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.500
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - EPA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1982
Title
EPA - Grazing Nonpoint Source Control Strategy
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />f-4 <br />C1:l <br />~.; <br />o <br /> <br />With severe over-grazing, plant density and plant cover are diminished, <br />runoff increases and soil losses accelerate because of exposure of the soil <br />surface. Sediments produced are carried to streams and lakes causing <br />turbidity and sedimentation and general degradation of the aquatic habitat. <br />Much of the semi-arid rangeland in Region VIII has shallow, poorly developed <br />soil. If this thin topsoil is lost, serious deterioration of the land and <br />reduced productivity occur. Much of the native rangeland in the West has been <br />damaged to some extent. But most rangelands have not deteriorated to the <br />point where improved grazing management, modern revegetation technology, and <br />land treatment for erosion control can not restore them to a semblance of <br />their original productivity. Much progress has been made during the last half <br />century in improving vegetative cover and stabilizing soil conditions on <br />western rangelands, but efforts need to be expanded and accelerated for the <br />accrual of greatest benefits to watershed stability and water quality <br />improvement and to the individuals dependent on these lands for their <br />li veli hood. <br /> <br />The technology for revegetating depleted rangeland and controlling <br />excessive runoff and erosion is well-established, but application of these <br />measures is costly. By far the most cost effective alternative is a <br />preventative program of maintaining rangelands in good or improving condition <br />by good grazing management. <br /> <br />Range condition is commonly considered to be the state and health of <br />rangeland canpared to what that rangeland is naturally capable of producing, <br />taking into account existing climate, physiography and soils. Stated another <br />way, it is an estimate of the degree to which the present vegetation and <br />ground cover depart from that which is presumed to be the natural potenti a1 <br />for the site, discounting natural catastrophies and man's impacts. <br /> <br />Range condition classification is based principally on density and <br />quality of plant cover and the degree of soil stability. A range in good <br />condition is producing all or nearly all of the high value perennial plants <br />that it is capable of producing and the soil is stable and fully productive, <br />showing little or no evidence of erosion. A range in poor condition has lost <br />much of its vegetative cover and erosion is active because of the exposed soil <br />surface. Much topsoil has been lost, rills and gullies are evident, and very <br />few high value perennial plants remain. Low value annuals and perennial are <br />dominant on the area. Even ranges in fair condition have begun to lose some <br />vegetative cover and some active erosion is occurring. Only good condition <br />rangelands are essentially free of serious erosion. <br /> <br />- 7 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.