My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00036
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:29:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
3/1/1975
Author
BOR
Title
San Juan Ecology Project - Interim Progress Report - March 1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />001588 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />breeding season ended the earliest of the 3 years. <br />and this was when the highest population densities <br />occurred. Krebs et a1. (1973) found that at high <br />population densities, meadow voles (Microtus pennsy!- <br />vanicus) stopped breeding sooner than at low popula- <br />tion densities. This feed-back mechanism apparently <br />also occurs in the deer mouse population. When popu- <br />lation densities were low and onset of breeding was <br />delayed by snowpackt the greater proportion of breed- <br />ing occurred later in the summer. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- Summary <br /> <br />The population density of deer mice was low after the <br />severe winter of 1972-73. Also, breeding was delayed <br />by the prolonged suowpack. The population has adapted <br />somewhat to such environmental streSB. Thus, in re- <br />sponse to this stress, the breeding season lasted <br />longer in 1973. The majority of breeding occurred <br />later in the summer than in previous years when popu- <br />lation densities were higher. However, the extension <br />of the breeding season did not enable the population <br />to recover completely. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4.7.3. Job 2 Population Density (Harold Steinhoff) <br /> <br />- Objectives <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The objectives of the population density portion of <br />the small mannnal study are to relate varying snowfall <br />to varying population density of small mannnals and to <br />associated population parameters ~uch as proportion <br />of young, fertility rates, and litter size. Ques- <br />tions we are asking include: (1) How does population <br />density of small mammals relate to varying snowpack?, <br />(2) How does litter size of small mammals relate to <br />-varying snowpack?, and (3) How does age structure of <br />small mammal populations relate to varying snowpack? <br />My hypothesis is that Calhoun population indices of <br />deer mice, red-backed voles, and chipmunks will de- <br />crease after a heavy snow year while those of montane <br />voles will not. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- Procedures <br /> <br />Paired Calhoun census lines were run in late summer <br />of 1970, 1971, 1972, and 1973 in each major vegeta- <br />tive type available at each of the three elevational <br />sites in each of the three study areas, Missionary <br />Ridge, Wolf Creek, and Rico. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- Findings <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Missionary Ridge - <br /> <br />Most small mammal populations on Missionary Ridge de- <br />creased markedly in 1973 after three previous years <br />of quite consistent increase (Table 3). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table 3. Population indices of small mammals in re- <br /> lation to snow. <br /> 1970 1971 1972 1973 <br />Missionary Ridge <br />Snow Course 1/, % of mean 96% 75% 78% 147% <br />Snow Disappearance Date 5-20 5-16 6-24 <br />Small Mammal Pop. (C/100TN) <br />Deermouse 2/ 0.6 1.6 1.9 0.4 <br />Colorado Chipmunk 0.9 1.7 2.1 0.8 <br />Red-backed Vole 0.6 0.8 2.2 0.5 <br />Microtus spp. 1.0 1.5 3.3 3.3 <br />Rico <br />Snow Cpurse, % of mean 94% 81% 62% 140% <br />Small Mammal Pop. (C/100TN) <br />Deermouse 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.8 <br />Colorado Chipmunk 1.3 1.3 1.5 0.7 <br />Red-backed Vole 0.0 0.8 1.8 0.2 <br />Microtus spp. 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.1 <br />Wolf Creek <br />Snow Course, % of mean 96% 76% 78% 128% <br />Small- Mammal Pop. (C/100TN) <br />Deermouse 0..6 1.1 0.2 <br />Colorado Chipmunk 3.1 3.4 2.3 <br />Red-backed Vole 0.8 1.2 1.3 <br />Microtus spp. 0.2 3.2 1.5 <br /> <br />1/ Mean of SCS Snow Courses maximum depths, as <br />follows: <br />Missionary Ridge - Cascade, Pur~atory, Spud Mountain <br />Rico - Rico, Lizard Head <br />Wolf Creek - Upper San Juan. Wolf Creek Summit <br /> <br />Jj <br /> <br />Deermouse (peromvscus maniculatus), Colorado <br />Chipmunk (Eutamias quadrivittatus), Red-backed <br />Vole (Clethrionomys Kapper1), M~crotus spp <br />(~. montanus and~. lonKicaudus. <br /> <br />Microtus spp. populations were the exception. They <br />remained at the same high level as 1972. The popula- <br />tion changes of deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), <br />Colorado chipmunks (Eutamias Quadrivittatus, and red- <br />backed voles (Clethrionomvs Kapperi) wer~ strongly <br />inversely correlated with snow depth in these years <br />as can be seen in Table 3. The relation of the <br />deermouse population to snow-free date was tested by <br />analysis of covariance and found significant <br />(F=2206.0, F.05-l.99). The sample size of 32 will <br />permit a valid estimate within 20% of the true mean <br />with 95% probability. The smallest difference in <br />deermouse populations means of Missionary Ridge is <br />about 42%, so there is sufficient sample size to <br />detect easily and significant differences in popula- <br />tion between years. Thus the possibility is strength- <br />ened that there is in fact a relationship between <br />snow depth and small mammal populations. at least for <br />deermice. Each additional year of data is increas- <br />ingly valuable now because only one year of complete- <br />ly reversed results would engender almost over- <br />whelming doubt that the relationship actually exists. <br />A continued strong correlation would greatly increase <br />confidence in the tentative conclusions that the <br />relationship does exist. <br /> <br />. <br />Other population parameters associated with popula- <br />tion change. and which may help to explain the <br />mechanism are shown in Table 4. The population <br />decline in deermice cannot be explained by reduced <br />natality or by differential mortality of young <br />because number of young per litter, proportion of <br />young, and fertility rate of deermice has remained <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />,ii< ,J:l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.