Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />00158 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3000 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />III <br />L <br />dJ <br />+' <br />dJ <br />E <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />z <br />o <br />I- <br /><( <br />> <br />W <br />--I <br />W <br /> <br />2500 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br /> <br />Snow Cover <br /> <br />~ complete <br /> <br />'IIII/, partial <br /> <br />SEPT <br /> <br />OCT <br /> <br />NOV <br /> <br />DEC <br /> <br />JAN FEB <br /> <br />MAR APR <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Critical Snow Depth - <br /> <br />Figure 3. Elevation of Wintering elk as ~elated to Snow Cover, 1972-73. <br /> <br />evidence of impaired mobility; but it is not known <br />whether or not this was deleterious. <br /> <br />In 1970-71, all winter sightings of elk were in areas <br />with less than 35 em of penetrable snow cover. In <br />one case, elk were seen in an area with 55 em of total <br />snow coverj however, a hard layer (75 kg ram hardness) <br />25 em below the snow surface limited hoof penetration <br />to 15-20 em. During the second winter season <br />(1971-72) elk were found in areas of sparse to no <br />snow cover, with ODe exception. In this instance. <br />elk were located with a snow cover averaging 50 em. <br />deep. Twenty-one of 25 ram profiles taken in this <br />area showed a ram hardness of 1 kg or less throughout <br />the snowpack, which indicates light powder snow <br />remaining four profiles registered ram hardnesses <br />between 1 and 5 kg. Hoof penetration in this area <br />averaged between 36 em and 32 cm. This past winter <br />(1972-73) elk were again located in areas of sparse to <br />no snow cover, when this type of habitat was available. <br />However, during December and January Missionary Ridge <br />was blanketed by a complete snow cover down to and <br />including the valley (Fig. 3). During this period elk <br />were found in snow depths of 50 to 90 em. One area <br />of elk usage which was not reachable by investigating <br />teams was estimated from snow stake readings to have <br />as much as 110 cm of snow. In three instances, hard <br />layers (5 kg hardness and 6 cm thickness) were deline- <br />ated at the ground surface, but in general the snow- <br />pack was again light (1 kg). Hoof penetration in <br />these areas ranged from 36 em to 65 em and averaged 51 <br />em. In areas with 70 em or more snow, there was <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />These snow depth readings indicate that a depth of <br />35 - 40 em of penetrable snow will cause elk on <br />Missionary Ridge to move to more winter range with a <br />lesser depth. This then could be considered the <br />"response depthll of snow for elk in this area. <br />(Previous reports have labeled this the "critical <br />depth" of snow for elk. However, it now seems more <br />appropriate to save the term Ilcritical depth" for <br />that depth of snow which may prohibit the use of an <br />area by elk.) Snow depths of 40 to 60 em apparently <br />do not pose undue stress, and are readily traversed <br />for food and shelter, when more exposed areas are not <br />available. Areas with 70 cm or more of penetrable <br />snow probably represent an added winter stress, and <br />are usually avoided. Seventy centimeters of pene- <br />trable snow then represents the critical depth of <br />snow for elk on Missionary Ridge. ' <br /> <br />4.6.2 Job 2. Calving (James M. Sweeney) <br />- Objective <br /> <br />Our objective is to answer the following questions: <br /> <br />1) Is the.spring upward movement by elk on Mission- <br />ary Ridge related to the receding snow line? <br /> <br />2) How is elk calving related to varying snowpack <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />;~.~ <br />