My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00036
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:29:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
3/1/1975
Author
BOR
Title
San Juan Ecology Project - Interim Progress Report - March 1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />001579 <br /> <br />the pattern is a result of the removal of snow by <br />wind from open areas and its deposition into drifts. <br />The melt of the drifts provides a good moisture <br />regime for seedling establishment up to where its edge <br />occurs in June or early July. That part of the area <br />where the drift melts later produces a wet or moist <br />meadow vegetation typical of the "snow glade. n This <br />produces the ribbon-like pattern of the forest. <br />Billings suggests that the ribbon forest and snow <br />glade areas can be expected "just below climatic <br />timberline wherever plateaus or gentle slopes are <br />exposed to heavy snowfall, strong winter winds, and <br />cool sununers." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4.3. 6 Conclusions <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The results of this study attest to, the significance <br />of snow associated parameters in determining subalpine <br />vegetation. This is supported by the work of other <br />investigators: Aulitzky, 1958; Billings, 1968; Brink, <br />1959; Franklin et al., 1971; Friedel, 1952; Geiger, <br />1971; Patten, 1963;- Waldmann, 1959; and Wardle, 1968. <br />Of special significance in forests is the effect snow <br />has on seedling establishment. Spruce and fir re- <br />generation may be limited at sites now supporting only <br />aspen trees because of the long dry periods during the <br />growing season, warm night temperatures, or high light <br />intensities. An increase in snowpack at these sites, <br />which would result in increased snow duration and <br />improved soil moisture and temperature conditions, <br />should increase the survival of spruce and fir seed- <br />lings. Solarization effects on spruce seedlings are <br />not as severe when moisture conditlons are favorable <br />(Ronco, 1970). Increased snowpack need not be <br />increased continuously to sssure establishment of <br />conifer seedlings in this habitat. Seedlings estab- <br />lished during one or two favorable growing sea,ons <br />may survive if the long-term'climatic conditions favor <br />their growth. In other words, with increased snowpack <br />there should be a tendency for stable aspen stands <br />with little or no conifer reproduction to succeed to <br />spruce-fir forest. Also, succession should proceed <br />more rapidly in successional aspen stands as condi- <br />tions become more favorable for the survival of the <br />spruce and fir seedlings. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Our results indicate that within the spruce-fir forest <br />spruce seedlings may be more tolerant of increased <br />snow duration than are fir seedlings (Figure 3). In <br />this case, survival of spruce seedling relative to fir <br />seedlings would be increased, resulting in stands of <br />higher relative densities of spruce. The resultant <br />absolute densities that would occur as a result of <br />increased snowpack would depend where along the snow <br />duration gradient a given site occurs. As is typical <br />of biological responses, the densities of spruce and <br />fir increase up to some optimal densities and then <br />decrease as the snow lies later. As the snow per- <br />sists, conditions become less favorable for all tree <br />seedling survival. The growing season may be short- <br />ened, the site may remain too wet from snowmelt for <br />seedlings to survive, pathogenic attack (snowmolds) <br />may cause increased mortality of seedlings that are <br />established. As the snow lies very late all tree <br />seedling establishment may be precluded. At this <br />extreme, tree seedling establishment depends on a <br />coincidence of good seed production and short term <br />weather conditions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Consistent with this response of tree species to <br />increased snow duration, the vegetation as a whole <br />tends to respond to increased snow duration. All <br />species have their unique responses to heat, light <br />end moisture regimes, and their own tolerances of <br />extremes of environmental conditions. As some species <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />are more adapted to what would be a slightly altered <br />environment, they would have a tendency to respond <br />more favorably to that environment. This would <br />result in a change in community structure as inter- <br />specific interactions would become altered, stabiliz- <br />ing with respect to that environmental change only <br />after some considerable time. As was pointed out <br />above, many of these species are long-lived peren- <br />nials. The eventual structure of a stand should be <br />one of plants that are more highly positively corre- <br />lated with snow.duration. Stands would lose some <br />species and gain others, depending on the species <br />tolerances to snow duration and associated factors, <br />and the outcome of the new species interactions. <br />These may be predicted from Table 1. <br /> <br />4.3.7 Summary <br /> <br />The objectives of this study are to provide a quanti- <br />tative descr~ption of the subalpine forest of the San <br />Juan MOuntains within which the results of the other <br />investigations may be expressed and to predict the <br />effects that weather modification may have on the <br />composition and dynamics of this vegetation. The <br />establishment of experiments was not feasible, due <br />to the very slow response of communities dominated by <br />long-lived perennials. Principal environmental <br />gradients along which the subalpine forest responds <br />were sought. This information was then used to <br />predict possible changes caused by weather modifica- <br />tion. Principal components analysis was used to <br />determine the major gradients in the vegetation of <br />the subalpine forests. The analysis provided cor- <br />relations of measured environmental parameters with <br />the major vegetation gradients. The gradient which <br />accounts for the most variation in the vegetation was <br />found to be the snow duration gradient. <br /> <br />The responses of. several understory species over a <br />snow duration gradient are described. Some species <br />attain their highest values of frequency of occur- <br />rence in stands where snow disappears early. Other <br />species had maximum frequency values where snow is <br />very persistant. Still other species have maxima <br />between these two extremes. <br /> <br />It was found that quaking aspen, subalpine fir, and <br />Englemann spruce trees vary in their response to the <br />snow duration gradient. Aspen is present at higher <br />densities where the snow leaves early. As snow lies <br />later more spruce and fir are found with the aspen. <br />First fir and then spruce trees reach dominance in <br />numbers as the snow persists. A similar response to <br />snow duration was found for the seedlings of these <br />subalpine tree species. <br /> <br />A species will succeed in an environment where it has <br />the ability to become established and to maintain <br />itself. An increased snowfall resulting in a larger <br />snowpack and a delayed snowmelt will result in <br />delayed soil moisture depletion and temperature rise, <br />lower light levels until the snow is gone, an in- <br />crease in and longer duration of physical pressure on <br />the vegetation, a longer duration of protection of the <br />vegetation by the snowpack environment, and an in- <br />creased susceptabi1ity to snowmolds. Each species <br />reacts differently to these factors~ The result is <br />an alteration in community structure. <br /> <br />It was concluded that an increased snowfall which <br />resulted in a longer snow duration would favor spruce <br />and fir seedling establishment in those aspen stands <br />presently stable (without coniferous reproduction). <br />Conifer seedling success would be favored more in <br />successional aspen stands, resulting in more rapid <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />,';;" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.