Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4.3.1 Introduction <br /> <br />4.3 PHYTOSOCIOLOGY (Dr. R.L. Dix and J.D. Richards) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Vegetation continuously responds to the physical <br />environment and therefore any significant change in <br />that environment through time can be expected to <br />cause a corresponding change in vegetation. There- <br />fore, possible increases in snowpack and snow dura- <br />tion, which may be brought abput by the weather <br />modification program in the San Juan Mountains, can <br />be expected to result in adjustments in its vegetation <br />structure and dynamics. Since the dominant plant <br />species of this vegetation are long lived perennials, <br />this adjustment is expected to be slow, it will <br />probably occur over a period of many decades. The <br />establishment of the weather modification program <br />before adequate research had begun on the vegetation <br />of the San Juan Mountains necessarily precludes the <br />establishment of appropriate experiments. We are, <br />therefore, limited to studies which show the principal <br />environmental gradients along which vegetation <br />responds and to determining the nature and magnitude <br />of these responses. This knowledge will enable us to <br />predict what changes may be expected as the physical <br />environment of the San Juan Mountains is artificially <br />modified. Limited time and funds also necessitated <br />th~t our study be limited to the subalpine forest of <br />these mountains. <br /> <br />4.3.2 Ob1ectives <br /> <br />The overall objectives of this project are twofold: <br />(1) to provide a quantitative description of the <br />subalpine forest of the San Juan Mountains within <br />which the results of other investigations may be <br />expressed (Table 1); and (2), to predict the effects <br />that weather modification may have on the composition <br />and dynamics of this vegetation. Since the establish- <br />ment of experiments was not possible, a major objec- <br />tive is to establish the principal environmental <br />gradients along which the subalpine forest responds so <br />that this information can be used to predict possible <br />changes whicb may be brought about by the weather <br />modification program. In addition, our description of <br />the subalpine forest provides a data base (too large <br />to be presented here), established during 1971-1973, <br />for the detection of possible changes in vegetation <br />associated with weather modification programs through <br />subsequent years. <br /> <br />4.3.3 Methods <br /> <br />Data were collected from 61 sites selected over a wide <br />range of environmental conditions. These included 20 <br />aspen, 37 Englemann spruce-subalpine fir, 3 white fir, <br />and 1 douglas fir dominated stands. The majority of <br />these stands are located on Missionary Ridge, although <br />a few were selected from the Rico and Wolf Creek Pass <br />study areas. <br /> <br />Standard phytosociological techniques were used to <br />measure tree species for density, dominance (basal <br />area), height, vitality and age structure. These tree <br />species were measured in 3 size classes: (1) trees <br />(diameter at breast height (dbh) greater than or equal <br />to 8.16 cm.), (2) saplings (dbh greater than 2.54 cm. <br />but less than 8.16 cm.), and (3) seedlings (dbh equal <br />to or less than 2.54 em.). Cover and frequency were <br />recorded for shrubs. Frequency values, in 50 x 50 em. <br />quadrants, were obtained for all understory species. <br />Selected environmental parameters were recorded from <br />each site. Snow duration data were determined for 23 <br />sites from sequential aerial photographs from flights <br />flown in 1971. Partial snow duration data are <br /> <br />available for 4 additional stands. More frequent and <br />more extensive photo coverage was expected from 1973 <br />aerial surveys, but did not materialize. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Principal components analysis (PCA), a form of <br />indirect gradient analysis, was used to define the <br />major structural gradients within the vegetation, and <br />to correlate measured environmental parameters to <br />those gradients. The gradients defined by the prin- <br />cipal components analysis are vegetational gradients <br />which are determined statistically to account for as <br />much of the variation in the vegetational data as <br />possible. The analysis allows correlations of the <br />measured environmental parameters with the derived <br />vegetational gradients. Understory species data were <br />used in the analysis since the large number of <br />species involved provides for precise definitions of <br />the vegetational gradients. The methodology of PCA <br />has been used and discussed by Seal (1964), Orloci <br />(1966), Gittens (1969), and Walker and Wehrhahn <br />(1971) . <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4.3.4 Results <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Our first objective of providing a quantitative <br />description of the subalpine vegetation of the San <br />Juan Mountains is given below in the presentation of <br />the indirect gradient analysis. This particular <br />method of display will probably be most useful to <br />other workers on the project because it provides the <br />phytosocio10gical display on the gradients of <br />greatest interest; namely to snow duration and <br />related gradients. Our second objective of providing <br />an analysis of the effects of weather modification on <br />vegetational composition is treated below by tech- <br />niques of direct gradient analyses. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />- Indirect gradient analysis <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Major gradients in the vegetation were derived from a <br />principal components analysis (PCA) of the understqry <br />species frequency data. So that snow duration dll:ta <br />could be included in the analysis, and an interpreta- <br />tion of snow duration effects could be made, only <br />those stands with aerial photo coverage were used in <br />the analysis presented here. Another peA using 57 <br />subalpine stands (the 23 snow duration stands plus 34 <br />stands not within the aerial survey) was done with <br />virtually identical results; therefore, the gradients <br />described by the analysis of only the stands with <br />photo coverage are presented. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Table 1 shows the first three gradients or components <br />described by the PCA. The first component is a <br />gradient which accounts for the maximum possible <br />variance in the data, and each successive component <br />accounts for as much of the remaining variance as <br />possible. Each species has a loading on each <br />component which is, in fact, the correlation coeffi- <br />cient between that species and that component (or <br />gradient). The square of this loading is the propor- <br />tion of variance of the species' data accounted for <br />by that component. The column IIh21l is the sum <br />squares of the first three components and is the <br />amount of variance in the data of that species which <br />is accounted for by the first three components. A <br />total of 94 understory species, 5 tree species, and <br />10 environmental parameters was included in the PCA. <br />For brevity the table includes only those species for <br />which: (1) over 65% of the variance was accounted for <br />by the first three components, or the loading on the <br />first component was greater than 0.6, and the species <br />was present in more than one stand on Missionary <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />;l <br /> <br />I <br />