Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />",1' <br />.. :~-) <br />00 <br />(-:J <br />~ <br /> <br />~, <br />"'~-' <br /> <br />TABLE OF COMPARISONS OF PROPOSED ORGANIZATIONS <br /> <br /> Perpetual Authority To Power of Authority Over Local <br />Proposed Organization Existence Charge Tolls Eminent Dom.:.. Lateral Users Control <br />Sub-District of Colo. <br />River Water Cons. Dist.* Yes Yes Yes Yes No <br />Ute Water Conservancy <br />District * Yes Yes Yes Yes No <br />Grand Junction <br />Drainage Dist. * Yes No Yes No No <br />Mesa County Soil <br />Cons. District * Yes No Yes No Yes <br />Lateral Ditch <br />Corporations Yes Yes Yes** Yes Yes <br />Internal Impr. Dist. * Yes No Yes No Yes <br />Irrigation Districts Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />Private Ditch Corps. Yes Yes Yes** Voluntary Yes <br /> Contractual <br />Water Conservancy <br />Districts Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />The primary purposes and present activities of these Organizations do not include <br />operation and maintenance of laterals in the Grand Valley Unit Area. <br /> <br />** <br /> <br />Eminent domain power of private corporations are not as br'oad as quasi-municipal <br />organizations such as Irrigation Districts and Water Conservancy Districts. See PP. <br />20-21, 28 and Footnote 6 and 10 supra. <br /> <br />-42- <br />